Loading...
4/14/2021 - Planning Commission - Regular - AgendasCITY OF SPRING PARK PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA SPRING PARK On Lake Minnetonka 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL 4. ADOPT AGENDA 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. February 10, 2021 Meeting Minutes 6. CONSIDERATION / DISCUSSION ITEMS A. 3900 Northern Avenue Variance Request i. Staff Presentation ii. Open Public Hearing iii. Public Comments iv. Close Public Hearing V. Discussion / Recommendation 7. COMMUNICATIONS 8. MISCELLANEOUS A. Business Appearances i. Dumpsters ii. Signs iii. Store Fronts 9. ADJOURNMENT APRIL 14, 2021 - 6:00 PM SPRING PARK CITY HALL s SPRING PARK On Lake Minnetonka 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE CITY OF SPRING PARK PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 3. ROLL CALL Present: Hoffman, Kaczanowski, Avalos, Mason Remote: Homan FEBRUARY 10, 2021 — 6:00 PM SPRING PARK CITY HALL 4. ADOPT AGENDA Avalos motioned, being seconded by Mason to approve the agenda as presented. On vote being taken, the motion was unanimously approved. 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Avalos motioned, being seconded by Kaczanowski to approve the January 13, 2021 Planning Commission Minutes. On vote being taken, the motion was unanimously approved. 6. CONSIDERATION / DISCUSSION ITEMS a. Setback Discussion City Planner Brixius reviewed current setbacks requirements. He stated the way the Comprehensive Plan reads as part of the City policy we like to promote reinvestment in our existing housing stock through renovation or expansion. Brixius reviewed the lot area map and lot width map and stated most of the lots have a greater land value than home value. The way the ordinance is written we consider a substandard lot buildable if it has sewer service and meets the required setbacks. The last few years we have not had a single- family home or duplex expand without a variance. Brixius reviewed nonconforming rules and lots of record. Lawful nonconforming buildings and structures may be expanded to improve livability and/or utility, provided the structure is not expanded into the required setback areas, for uses which conform to the provisions of this chapter. Vertical expansion of the house above the existing footprint of a structure shall not constitute an increase in the nonconformity. Mason inquired to how much building must remain to rebuild, and discussion was had on state statute. Brixius reviewed variance criteria and stated a variance may be granted when the applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. Brixius stated Spring Park has multiple lots that are legal nonconforming. Recently every application for expansion and total redevelopment submitted to the City require variances which has led to this discussion on if setbacks should be changed. Sunset Drive and other existing properties were reviewed along with some recent variances. Brixius reviewed setback requirements for other cities and discussion was had on options for the City to consider. Standards in Excelsior were also reviewed. Kaczanowski left the meeting. Brixius reviewed some building examples and Spring Park examples and asked what the City wants and should allow for house width. Avalos inquired to what a safe wall to wall distance would be. Brixius stated that by building code any building that is less than 5 feet within each other have additional requirements. Those concerns are satisfied through the building permit process and discussion was had on safety. Hoffman stated that Long Range Planning and public consensus was to not have houses so close to one another and the reason the current standards were made was to slowly get to that point. Discussion was had on vertical expansion, proper spacing between homes, and the main goal of the City. Brixius stated our ordinances tend to favor the property owner as the City recognizes difficulty of the small lots. The City also recognizes the value of land is so great it justifies improvements adding to the value of homes. After further discussion and consideration, Brixius stated when looking at the expansion of existing homes the current variance process is probably the best method moving forward. The process of a variance requires a hearing, giving the City input from neighboring properties and allows the City to make additional conditions. Discussion was had on the front yard setback and how people use their property. Brixius would like the commission to consider coming up with a minimum house width. It would not require ordinance change but would give a model for staff to look at when property owners come in to plan their expansion or build. He would like to discuss further next month and come up with a plan to guide people in their planning. Hoffman is also in favor of coming up with a plan to justify their decisions and consensus of the commission agreed. Brixius updated commission members on the 4000 Sunset property survey. Mason inquired if City costs have been exceeding the cost of the variance. Tolsma reviewed the process of variance costs and discussion was had. Tolsma will look at the base fee and escrow costs and bring a recommendation to the Council in March. Discussion was also had on other permit fees that should be established. 7. COMMUNICATIONS 8. MISCELLANEOUS a. Planning Commission Duties Tolsma brought forward a discussion at the request of Mason regarding the Planning Commission duties. Mason inquired if the Planning Commission also serves as the Park Board. Tolsma stated the code does not specifically state the Planning Commission is responsible for parks or beautification. Tolsma asked the commission to review the current code as to bring forward a recommendation of changes to Council. The reappointment process was also discussed and will be brought back. Mason stated his main reason for bringing the discussion forward was to inquire about park improvements and the plaques. Tolsma gave an update on plaque fabrication and installation. Discussion was had on short term rental inspection and Tolsma updated the commission on where the City is at in the process. 9. ADJOURNMENT There being no further discussion, Mason motioned, being seconded by Avalos to adjourn. On vote being taken, the motion was unanimously approved. NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 4800 Olson Memorial Highway, Suite 202, Golden Valley, MN 55422 Telephone: 763.231.2555 Facsimile: 763.231.2561 plan ners(a)nacplanning.com PLANNING REPORT TO: Dan Tolsma FROM: Alan Brixius / Daniel Elder DATE: April 6, 2021 RE: Spring Park — Variance request — Side yard setback; 3900 Northern Ave FILE NO: 175.01 — 21.01 PID: 1711723330066 BACKGROUND: Adam Rowan is seeking a variance from the R-1 district side yard setback requirement for the single-family property located at 3900 Northern Ave. The variance is needed for the eastern side yard to construct an attached garage with additional living space on the second floor. The proposed addition is on the rear of the existing house. The property is located within an R-1, Single -Family and Two -Family Residential District. The proposed addition follows the existing east building line and the request is to allow a 9.7 foot setback from the eastern lot line. Due to the layout of the site, challenges existing in meeting the east side yard setback. With the building expansion and needed driveway, the net impervious surface on the lot will exceed 30% of the lot area and will require the property owner to meet the City's storm water management standards with the new construction Attached for reference: Exhibit A: Applicant Narrative Exhibit B: Aerial Image Exhibit C: Zoning Location Exhibit D: Existing Conditions Survey Exhibit E: Building Plans Foundation & Main Floor Exhibit F: Building Plans Upper Floor & Roof Exhibit G: Structural Notes Upper Floor Exhibit H: Structural Notes Main Floor ISSUES AND ANALYSIS Existing Site Challenges As illustrated in Exhibit B this property is in a neighborhood of the City that presents a number of challenges due to the physical characteristics of the lots and adjacent streets and how it was originally platted. The applicant's lot area of 7,275 sq. ft. falls below the required lot area of 10,000 sq. ft. required in R-1 districts. The existing home has a non -conforming setback from the eastern lot line. The survey shows a setback of approximately 8.8-foot setback at the southeast corner of the house expanding to 9.7 at the northeast corner of the house. The existing house is compliant with the other R-1 setbacks. Setbacks and Lot Requirements: The following table outlines the R-1 District standards for lot area and setbacks compared against the existing conditions on the lot in question: R-1 District Code: Existing Conditions: Proposed: Compliant: Lot Requirements: Lot Area 10,000 sq. ft. Single- Family* 7,275 sq. ft. N / A No *Existing Condition Lot Width 50 ft. 52 ft. N / A Yes Lot Coverage 30 percent 510 sq. ft. 7% 2,564 sq. ft. 35.3% No Setback Requirements: Existing Proposed Complaint Right -of -Way Setback 30 ft. 38 ft (approx.) 38 ft Yes Side Yard Setback east 10 ft. 8.8 to 9.7 9.7 ft. No Side Yard Setback west 10 ft. 16.5 16.5 — 19.3ft Yes The table above shows the required R-1 district setback, compared to the existing house and new addition setbacks. The new home addition requires a variance from the required 10 foot required side setback from the east lot line. The new addition will be 9.7 feet at its closes point to the east lot line. The variance request is four approximately 4 inches. VARIANCE REVIEW CRITERIA Section 42-165 of the Spring Park ordinance states that the purpose for establishing a variance process is to provide: 061 • Variances from the literal provisions of the chapter in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration not resulting from the actions of an individual, and where it is demonstrated that such variance will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the chapter. (a) In considering any request for a variance and in taking subsequent action, planning commission and the city council, serving as the board of adjustment and appeals, shall make a finding of fact that the granting of such variance will not: (1) Impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property. Staff Comment: The expansion that is taking place will not impact the supply of light and air to adjacent properties. (2) Unreasonably increase the congestion in the public streets. Staff Comment: The proposed use continues to be a permitted single- family home. The addition of an attached garage and additional living space and is not expected to increase traffic in the immediate area. (3) Increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety. Staff Comment: The purposed use is not expected to increase the danger of fire or endanger public safety. (4) Unreasonably diminish or impair established property values within the neighborhood, or in any other way be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Staff Comment: The addition of an attached garage and additional living space will be very similar to neighboring properties and will not diminish or impair property values. Approval of the variance request is not expected to or impair property values. (5) Violate the intent and purpose of the City Comprehensive Plan. Staff Comment: The Spring Park 2040 Comprehensive Plan states in Strategy 2 that it will promote the renovation and reinvestment in existing homes as a priority for the City. The expansion of the house and garage will allow for the renovation and reinvestment in the community. (b) A variance from the requirements of this chapter shall be permitted only when: • The requested variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance 3 Finding: The expansion of the single-family detached home with an attached garage is permitted in an R-1 district within the City of Spring Park as stated in section 42-276 of the City Code. (c) No variance shall be granted that would allow any use that is not permitted in the zoning district in which the subject property is located. Finding: A house with an attached garage is an allowed uses in an R-1 district within the City of Spring Park as stated in section 42-276 of the City Code. (d) A variance may be granted when the applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance without a variance. Finding: As discussed, the parcel's size and shape creates numerous challenges in the construction of a home without requiring a variance for the lot setbacks. Practical difficulties with this variance request are not solely related to economic considerations. The proposal is of the same use as before would not change the essential character of the neighborhood. Lot Coverage: The building addition and related driveway will expand hardcover on the property over the City's 30% standard (35.3% impervious surface per the applicant's calculations). This percentage needs to be verified with the submission of a detailed site and grading plan showing driveway dimensions and configuration and any other new hardcover. Sec. 42-279 of the City Code, Lot Requirements and Setbacks, allows properties to exceed 30% hardcover and go up 40% impervious surface the property owner applies one of the following conditions to the site design: The lot shall provide for the collection and treatment of stormwater in compliance with the city stormwater management plan if determined that the site improvements will result in increased runoff directly entering a public water. All development plans shall require review and approval by the city engineer. The property owner shall be responsible for installing one or more of the measures recommended by the city engineer to mitigate the impact of additional impervious surface. Plans must also be reviewed by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District when projects meet criteria requiring watershed district review and approval. 2. Measures to be taken for the treatment of stormwater runoff and/or prevention of stormwater from directly entering a public water. The measures may include, but not be limited to the following: Installation of rain gardens, infiltration basins, or bio filtration basins should be considered for treatment of stormwater runoff from hard surfaces. Filtration basins should be considered if soil conditions are not favorable for infiltration. It • Installation of erosion control devices, including silt fence, bio-rolls, erosion control blanket, and storm sewer inlet protection should be used. • Installation of oil -skimming devices and sump catch basins should be used to improve water quality. • Stormwater runoff from hard surfaces should be directed into pervious areas (grassed lawns or landscape beds) through site grading and use of gutters and downspouts. • Hard surfaces should be constructed using pervious pavement or pavers or raised materials such as decking which has natural earth or other pervious material beneath or between the planking. • Grading and construction techniques should be implemented that encourage infiltration of stormwater runoff. • Installation of berms or basins should be considered to temporarily detain water before dispersing it into pervious area. Comment: The applicant will need to provide a site grading and drainage plan and a Stormwater Management Plan to meet the City's Code for construction that exceeds 30% impervious surface. The current proposal has an applicant calculated 35.3% impervious surface. This percentage will need to be verified. Site & Grading Plans While the staff is supportive of the variance for the expansion of the home, the applicant needs to provide a scaled site plan illustrating the existing building, the new addition, the driveway location and design, and automobile turning movements accessing and egressing from the garage. The applicant will also need to provide a grading plan that illustrates driveway grades, drainage patterns, and storm water management to verify the amount of hardcover and ensure that runoff is not directed into neighboring properties. Staff has concerns regarding the site layout related to accessing and egressing the new side loaded garage. The applicant's garage is designed as a 23-foot-deep garage, which leaves approximately 19 feet between the garage door and the west lot line. The proposed driveway will need to be setback at a minimum of 1 foot from the west lot line and demonstrate the automobiles will not trespass on the property to the west with its turning movement. The one foot setback leaves 18 feet for vehicle turning movements. Generally, a ninety -degree parking stall will need 22 to 24 feet of aisle depth to allow clean access and egress movements. Garage stalls typically require additional distance depending on the garage door's width. The applicant has not provided a site plan showing driveway design and the turning movements needed to have automobile access and exit the garage. RECOMMENDATION: In reviewing this application, staff has measured the variance request against Spring Park's Code of Ordinances and Minnesota State Statute 462.357 regarding Land Use Variances. Both documents outline the necessity of the variance allowing reasonable use of the property and overcoming existing practical difficulties with the lot. Based on the findings outlined in the report, staff finds that the proposed variance offers reasonable use of the property. There are practical difficulties unique to the property that warrant variance considerations. Based on this report's variance findings, staff recommends approval of the applicant's request for a variance from the side yard setback requirements for the property at 3900 Northern Avenue with the following conditions being met prior to issuance of a building permit. 1. Submission of a complete site plan showing the expanded building, driveway location, design, configuration, and automobile turning movements accessing and egressing from the garage. 2. The driveway shall maintain a minimum of a one foot setback from the west lot line and demonstrate that automobiles will not travel beyond the property line. 3. The site will exceed 30% hardcover. The applicant shall be required to meet the conditions outlined in Sec. 42-279 (4) b. in order to mitigate the storm water impacts of the building expansion and the driveway construction. • The applicant will submit a site grading and drainage plan to ensure proper stormwater management practices. This plan will be subject to review and approval by the city engineer. All runoff from the house and the proposed driveway shall direct runoff away from the adjacent properties and into one of the stormwater management options listed in sec. 42-279. If these issues can be satisfactorily addressed, staff believes a variance approval may be warranted. CC: Adam Rowan Dan Tolsma Scott Qualle Corey Bergman 6 7 007 '007 1 r04 �_,, G%G FAIDIK UtNtKAL LANu Uat ArrLII:A I IUN Application No: Date Filed: Date Complete: Received By: Base Fee: Escrow: Instructions: Please read carefully and answer all questions thoroughly. Only complete applications will be accepted after validation by the Zoning Administrator, and prior to acceptance of required processing ' fees and escrows. PROPERTY INFORMATION Property Identification Number Street Address: 39Go Legal Description: Other information: D): 17117-3t-3330o66 APPLICATION INFORMATION Name: 48aro ROVVOO Address: 3°1ov (7nhVo de City: Sprin4 PafK State: Telephone Fax V Business Name: PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION (if other than applicant) Name: Business Name: Address: City: State: Telephone Fax REQUEST Comprehensive Plan Amendment Ordinance Amendment (text or map) Conditional Use Permit Interim Use Permit Administrative Permit Variance Appeal DESCRIPTION of REQUEST Existing Use of Property: Nature of Proposed Use: Reason(s) to Approve Request: ha+ �I ijh4ly ts, Qac I Cl� ku5� tfi.S Zip Code 5 53 8�- e-mail Zip Code e-mail Site and Building Plan Review Subdivision Sketch Review PUD (concept plan/development) Preliminary Plat Final Plat X Minor Subdivision Other: additional sheets as necessary) ;nu pn a-�ioc ht 1� 11Vvn� us 5 S khan I a " uL>r foOr- C/� 0\` h°u5C . q' 7 U�4i 5U (vtC J �i: 4 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot IS, SUBDIVISION OF LOTS 8, 9, 10 & 11 SKARP AND LIlVDQUISTS '- 5 HAZELDELL ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota. . E. N 78.58.3Q" SCOPE OF WORK & LIMITATIONS' 1. Showing the length and direction of boundary lines of the legal description / 1 listed above. The scope of our services does not include determining what you own, which is a legal matter. Please check the legal description with your records or consult with competent legal counsel, if necessary, to make - sure that it is correct and that any matters of record, such as easements, that to be included the have been you wish on survey shown. 2. Showing the location of observed existing improvements we deem necessary for the survey. 3. Setting survey markers or verifying existing survey markers to establish the ° u a / comers of the property.` 4. Existing building dimensions and Setbacks measured to outside of siding or 6 / stucco. 9 ,jS y �v 5. This survey bas been completed without the benefit of a current title commitment. There may be existing easements or other encumbrances that would be revealed by a current title commitment. Therefore, this survey t V) does not purport to show any easements or encumbrances other than the ones shown hereon. i , n, le.J a e. 6. It should be noted that this survey was completed with significant snow 00 P O coverage on site. We cannot be certain that all items were observed and located during the process of conducting the survey due to the snow cover. ---I --- 6/ '/ If this uncertainty is something you would like to remove, please expose all od EXISTING ; RT improvements and we can return to locate said items, if needed. HOUSE STANDARD SYMBOLS &CONVENTIONS: � s L4 v "0" Denotes von survey marker, found, as noted. J r COVERED o O PORCH Z b b LEGEND j o� a2 P'ONFr POE AIR CONDITIONER ❑4 ELECTRIC METER CIIAIIILINK •\ ❑- CAS METER Fil GAS Yl:7FR (\ ` © DECIDUOUS TREE V\ X FENCE LEE \V. , A6. P1PE E owaEAD UTUTr LINE ATE — WtON F� / SLOT CORNER P� / 55. 05 g3 FALLS IN TIME L_ 08 51 D=1 NORTHERN AVE Advance Surveying 8 Eng/ireeAng, Co_ 17917 HNhw y No. 7 Mlnnetonka. Minnesota 55345 Pho— (952)474-7964 Web: —&—.— CLIENT/JOB ADDRESS ADAM ROWAN 3900 NORTHERN AVE SPRING PART{ MN SHEET TITLE EXISTING CONDITIONS SHEET SIZE: 11 X 17 DRAWING NUMBER 210141 ADS DATE SURVEYED: 0224/2021 I DATE DRAFTED: 02/242021 I HELM CWDFY TNAT THIS RAN, SURVEY OR REPWT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR uMDt MY DIRECT 3JUN9GIl AM THAT I AM A INLY REGISTERED LAM V avn #42379 02/25/2021 UCENSE W. OATS 0 20 40' SHEET NO. S1 GENERAL NOTES: 1. ALL CONCRETE TO BEAR ON FIRM, NATURAL UNDISTURBED SOIL. CONSTRICT FOOTING TO BELOW FROST LINE. 2. ALL DIMENSIONS TO BE VERIFIED BY CONTRACTOR BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS 3. ALL DOOR RETURNS TO BE S' MIN. UNLESS OTHERWISE DIMENSIONED ON PLAN I. IT 15 THE GENERAL CONTRACTORS RESPONSIUBLTTY TO SUBMIT FOR RENEW ALL ILLUSTRATED PLAN DRAWINGS BY STRUCTURAL, CIVIL MECHANICAL, AND PLUMBING ENGINEER BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH BUILDING TO ENSURE CONSTRUCTAWLITY AND ABIDING BY ALL REQUIRED BUILDING CODES. ILL I i n _ w b.b I I I I I I I I I I I I 12 12 �. I I I 6 6 F I I O BATHROOM I I I I I YEMFY EIOSING N YA I L I I I I I I / I I e I I q I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 12 I I I 6 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I L I G - b w UPPER FLOOR F A 1 = — LAN 1 = 1 —0 p 968 SO. FT. (W STAIR) w 9' CEILING TYPICAL z w 03 ro- w a CG le FRI Copyright ® 2021 A"W-1 J Palmer <� YImO DOYN 3 � N b s b b R C1AlOM0 LMlOmO GENERAL NOTES: 1. ALL CONCRETE TO BEAR ON FIRM, NATURAL UNDISTURBED SOIL. CONSTRUCT FOOTING TO BELOW FROST LINE. 2. ALL DIMENSIONS TO BE VERIFIED BY CONTRACTOR BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS 3. ALL DOOR RETURNS TO BE 5' MIN. UNLESS WI OTHERSE DIMENSIONED ON PLAN !. IT IS THE GENERAL CONTRACTORS RESPONSILIBURY TO SUBMIT FOR RENEW All ILLUSTRATED PLAN DRAWINGS BY STRUCTURAL, I CML, MECHANICAL, AND PLUMBING ENGINEER BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH BUILDING TO ENSURE CONSTRIKTABILRY AND ABIDING BY ALL REQUIRED BUILDING CODES. I _ I _ I BAMR001A j I — e4/It 1 CLOSET i w I I I I RFORODY dR 4 DAM aq/R --------------- I I _ I I DOSING FWNDATON. - i DDa DasTNc DITDI101! RAu 7 I I TIE-N NEW TO EMSPNG b O I I I I I.F I LAUNDRY "/ft p/R I I I I I I 1 1 r-- I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i i � aoor muaFo I I I I I I I I 1 I 11N� I I A I I I 1 1 W I I 1 I - I !' Cmmb 9m I I I I I I S j I I I I I x GARAGE 1 I 1 I l 0 I I 1 1 I n 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1]JI30 WNOErz FTG IYACAI I 1 I C- � F FOUNDATION — 853 SO. FT. (W STAIR) O 10' CEILING ® LAUNDRY & GARAGE ,z 8' CEILING m BEDROOM #'1?? V � 0 = ]FRO Copyright © 2021 Anthony 1 Palmer � t-�o t� S �G (-e F ` �)V, smar mk wmNPA. L"U snar® S(K-' IGmUenwTvcsT LW. m wvfwwD li COw mAcmm Zw71 KGOO remKrwrxu m VOaM owl KM wCDKnVCtMwEs*ae LLU31 MTm"oMvm M.A DVUMW BKile DMMare%,": L aanMOMIs 11 H Mal p 3 - /ln" 1,\jL k,,J-O f----6 Cx-rr-r DuvY-- RESIDENCE Or'IFIE ROWEN ANTHONY t, AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss COUNTY OF CARVER Diane Erickson being duly sworn on an oath, states or affirms that he/she is the Publisher's Designated Agent of the newspaper(s) known as: Laker Pioneer with the known office of issue being located in the county of: CARVER with additional circulation in the counties of: HENNEPIN and has full knowledge of the facts stated below: (A) The newspaper has complied with all of the requirements constituting qualifica- tion as a qualified newspaper as provided by Minn. Stat. §331A.02. (B) This Public Notice was printed and pub- lished in said newspaper(s) once each week, for 1 successive week(s); the first insertion being on 04/03/2021 and the last insertion being on 04/03/2021. MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE NOTICES Pursuant to Minnesota Stat. §580.033 relating to the publication of mortgage foreclosure notices: The newspaper complies with the conditions described in §580.033, subd. 1, clause (1) or (2). If the newspaper's known office of issue is located in a county adjoining the county where the mortgaged premises or some part of the mortgaged premises described in the notice are located, a substantial portion of the newspaper's circulation is in the latter county. By: Designated Agent Subscribed and sworn to or affirmed before me on 04/03/2021 by Diane Erickson. Notary Public ?t9'.i tw`b VC`�gprp�A'.j['N3iti'.NWOI'SN DARLENE MIARIE M�ACPHERSON NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA AAy Commission Expires Jan 31, 2024 Rate Information: (1) Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space: $15.00 per column inch Ad ID 1126946 CITY OF SPRING PARK NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the Spring Park Planning Commis- sion will hold a public hearing at 6:00 p.m. or soon thereafter on Wednesday April 14, 20201at the Spring Park City Hall, located at 4349 Warren Avenue, to consider the application for a variance for a reduced side yard setback from 10 feet to 9.7 feet to allow for the ex- pansion of the single family house at 3900 Northern Avenue in Spring Park Minnesota. Notice is further given that any written or oral comments from cit- izens regarding the proposed set- back variance will be heard at the public hearing. All interested per- sons are invited to attend the meet- ing and will be afforded the oppor- tunity to speak on the applications during the public hearing. Jennifer Nelson Spring Park City Clerk Published in the Laker Pioneer April 3, 2021 1126946