The URL can be used to link to this page

7/20/2020 - City Council - Regular - AgendasSPRING PARK On Lake 91+nnew.k 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE CITY OF SPRING PARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JULY 20, 2020 — 7:00 PM SPRING PARK CITY HALL 3. ADOPT MEETING AGENDA 4. ADOPT CONSENT AGENDA* a. City Council Work Session Meeting Minutes from May 18, 2020 b. City Council Special Meeting Minutes from June 23, 2020 c. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes from July 6, 2020 d. 2413 Black Lake Road Variance Extension — 1 Year 5. PUBLIC FORUM** 6. PRESENTATIONS & GUEST SPEAKERS a. 2019 Audit Presentation —Jim Eichten 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS 8. PETITIONS, REQUESTS- & APPLICATIONS a. Resolution 20-16: 4364/68 West Arm Rd East Variance Request b. Resolution 20-17: 4317 Channel Rd Variance Request 9. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS 10. REPORTS OF OFFICERS AND COMMITTEES a. Mayor & Council b. City Staff c. Contract Staff 11. NEW BUSINESS & COMMUNICATIONS 12. CLAIMS FOR PAYMENT a. July 20, 2020 Claims 13. UPCOMING MEETINGS & TRAINING a. July 22 — Police Commission — 8:00 AM b. July 22 — Fire Commission — 11:00 AM c. July 22 — LMCD Work Session at 6:00 PM with Regular Meeting at 7:00 PM d. August 3 — City Council Regular Meeting — 7:00 PM 14. MISCELLANEOUS (INFORMATION ONLY" a. Mound Fire Department June Report 15. SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION — COUNCIL CHAMBERS a. Special City Council Closed Executive Session to have an attorney -client privileged discussion related to ongoing litigation to enforce nuisance abatement at 2254 Lilac Road and 2433 Interlachen Road. The Closed Session will be convened pursuant to Minn. Stat. Section 13D.05, subd. 3(b). 16. RECONVENE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING 17. ADJOURNMENT * The Consent Agenda lists those items of business which are considered to be routine, recommended for approval, and/or which need no discussion. The several separate items listed on the Consent Agenda are acted upon by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member makes a request, in which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed elsewhere on the regular agenda for Council discussion and action. ** Under Public Forum individuals may address the City Council about any item not contained on the regular agenda. Each speaker should keep their statements to three minutes to allow sufficient time for others. The Council will take no official action on items discussed at the forum, with the exception of referral to staff for future report. !a SPRING PARK On Lake arinn.tonk CITY OF SPRING PARK WORK SESSION MINUTES MAY 18, 2020 - 6:00 PM SPRING PARK CITY HALL CALL TO ORDER - The work session was called to order by Mayor Rockvam at 6:00 p.m. Council Members Jerome P. Rockvam, Mayor; Mark Chase; Jeff Hoffman; Pamela Horton; and Present: Gary Hughes Staff Present: Dan Tolsma, City Administrator 1. RENTAL ORDINANCE DISCUSSION City Administrator Tolsma discussed the proposed short-term and long-term rental ordinances. Council Member Horton stated she is against allowing short-term rental properties in the City due to the increased traffic and disruption for surrounding homeowners. Furthermore, she stated she is against a long-term rental licensing program. Council Member Hughes stated he is also against allowing short-term rental properties in the City due to the issues created for surrounding property owners and potential impact to property values. Council Member Chase stated he is also opposed to allowing short-term rental properties in the City. He has discussed the issue with some of his neighbors and they are also opposed to short-term rentals due to the inconvenience and disruption to their neighborhood. He stated that properties are being purchased for the sole purpose of renting them out like a hotel and he would not like to have an operation like that located next to his home. City Administrator Tolsma stated that the public hearings brought out opinions on opposite ends of the spectrum, and there did not seem to be any middle ground, on the issue of short-term rentals. Council Member Hoffman stated that the Planning Commission process was to review the ordinance since it is currently not an allowed use in the City. The goal of the process was to craft an ordinance that would be manageable if the City Council decided to ultimately allow short-term rentals. However, if the decision is to keep the prohibition in place then the Council needs to look at an ordinance that clarifies its position in regards to short-term rental properties in the City. Mayor Rockvam asked what neighboring communities allow for short-term rentals. City Administrator Tolsma responded that most surrounding communities do not allow short-term rental properties. Mound took an approach where they decided to prohibit any new short-term rentals but grandfathered in the properties that were currently renting out their homes for short-term purposes. The other aspect to look at with surrounding communities is enforcement, there are listings for rentals online in cities where short-term rentals are prohibited so it is interesting to note how proactive these cities enforce their prohibition of short-term rentals. Mayor Rockvam stated that he personally does not have an issue with short-term rental properties. Council Member Hoffman stated that some of the issues that residents voiced were smaller but add up over time concerning disruption to neighbors. For example, short-term renters were unaware of which dock to use or where the property lines ended so they were unknowingly trespassing on the neighbor's property and that situation is less likely to occur with a long-term renter or owner -occupied property. Michael Mason, 3950 Del Otero Avenue and Planning Commissioner, discussed his experience with a short-term rental property in his neighborhood. He stated that he voted against the recommendation to allow short-term rental properties in the City because he has experienced several late -night parties, disruptions, and parking issues in the neighborhood. Council Member Chase asked about the Mound approach to grandfather in current short-term rental properties operating in the City. Council Member Hoffman responded that currently the Code does not allow short-term rental properties so it would be difficult to grandfather in a use that isn't currently allowed. He stated that the quandary is allowing the operation of a for -profit business in a residential district versus the right of a property owner to utilize their property as they see fit. City Administrator Tolsma stated that if the Council looks at it as a risk -benefit analysis then allowing short-term rentals benefits only a few properties in the City and potentially leads to frustrations for many. However, continuing and clarifying the prohibition of short-term rentals benefits more homeowners in the City whose neighborhoods will not be impacted by a commercial business operating in a residential district. The City Council consensus was to have staff draft an ordinance clarifying the City's prohibition of short-term rental properties in the City. City Administrator Tolsma asked for direction on the long-term rental licensing process. Council Member Hughes stated he is not in favor of a licensing process for long-term rental properties. He believes the program is too much for Spring Park and believes that Hennepin County already has a process in place for tenant -landlord disputes. City Administrator Tolsma discussed the current process when staff receive a rental complaint in the City and the Hennepin County escrow process. He added that the proposed rental licensing ordinance sets a standard for rental properties in the City and is more proactive. The escrow process with the County puts the burden on the tenant. Mayor Rockvam stated he doesn't want to make tenant -landlord disputes an issue for City staff to step-in and resolve. Council Member Hoffman stated that when he walks the City, the majority of dilapidated and unsafe rentals are single-family properties and not multi -family buildings. He wanted to inquire about applying the long-term rental ordinance to single-family properties only. City Administrator Tolsma responded that the draft ordinance can be edited to only apply to single and two-family properties. He added that in order to limit the ordinance in that manner there will need to be justification and rationale so he will discuss the matter with the City Attorney. Mayor Rockvam and Council Member Hughes are not in favor of any long-term rental licensing program. City Administrator Tolsma stated the biggest reason behind having a long-term rental ordinance is health and safety. There are single-family rental properties in the City that are unsafe and a licensing program would identify those homes that have life or death safety issues that need to be addressed. This is especially important in structures where there are children. Council Member Hoffman stated that health, safety, and welfare are of the utmost importance to him. If an adult renter wants to take a risk and live in unsafe conditions that is one argument. However, others can be injured at a dilapidated rental property that were unaware of the risk; for example, firefighters responding to a medical emergency, delivery drivers, cub scouts or other solicitors walking on an unsafe structure. He added that these safety issues are not being addressed right now. The City Council consensus was to have staff discuss the matter with the City Attorney and explore revising the long-term rental ordinance to apply to single and two-family properties only. 2. WATER TOWER ANTENNA LEASE EXTENSIONS City Administrator Tolsma discussed water tower antenna lease extension requests from Sprint and T-Mobile. He has contacted Kennedy & Graven for their opinion on the extension requests and to discuss the current market value of the lease versus the current contract. He asked for Council direction. The City Council consensus was to have staff survey neighboring cities about their current antenna lease agreements and to work with Kennedy & Graven to discuss counter -proposal options based on the information that is gathered. 3. CONSTITUTIONAL/BUSINESS FRIENDLY RESOLUTION Due to limited timing, this item was not discussed. 4. SCHEDULE SPECIAL MEETING TO DISCUSS WEST ARM RD WEST & CAPITAL PROJECTS LIST Mayor Rockvam asked for an update on the West Arm Road West Project. City Administrator Tolsma stated the plans for the water and sewer improvements will be available soon and then the bidding process can begin. He added that Mound Fire Chief Pederson will attend the special meeting to discuss fire truck access and safety issues on West Arm Road West. Mayor Rockvam would like the special meeting to occur soon so that the plans can be finalized. He added that he would like the City to consider implementing a policy that puts all City roads on a schedule for improvement and updates, including curb and gutter, so that the decision isn't dependent solely on public opinion at the time of the proposed project. City Administrator Tolsma agreed and stated these are the issues that can be discussed at the upcoming special meeting. He will contact Council to find a date that works for everybody. 5. ADJOURN — The work session was adjourned by unanimous consent at 6:59 p.m. Date Approved: July 20, 2020 Dan Tolsma, City Administrator Theresa Schyma, City Clerk 4 4�� SPRING PARK On Lake Wanemnhc CITY OF SPRING PARK SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 23, 2020 - 5:00 PM SPRING PARK CITY HALL 1. CALL TO ORDER - The special meeting was called to order by Mayor Rockvam at 5:00 p.m. Council Members Jerome P. Rockvam, Mayor; Mark Chase; Jeff Hoffman; Pamela Horton; and Present: Gary Hughes Staff Present: Dan Tolsma, City Administrator; Brian Hare, City Engineer; and Greg Pederson, Mound Fire Chief 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE — Mayor Rockvam led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. 3. ADOPT MEETING AGENDA M/Hughes, S/Horton to adopt the meeting agenda. ►� 0064r r 1 4. PRESENTATIONS & GUEST SPEAKERS a. West Arm Road West Utilities, Street, & Access Discussion i. Project Recap I Water & Sewer Repair Update iii. Street & Stormwater iv. Emergency Access & Fire Hydrants v. Financial Considerations vi. Resident Notification and Outreach City Engineer Hare presented the West Arm Road West feasibility report. He discussed options available for water, sewer, street, and stormwater improvements. He further discussed: • Project Area History • Fire Apparatus Access Road restriction, NFPA/IFC Non-compliance and Risk • Aging Sanitary/Water and Risk • Aging Street and Drainage needs • Proposed Improvements, Schedule, and Cost Mound Fire Chief Pederson discussed public safety issues regarding fire truck access on West Arm Road West. He stated that the road, hydrants, and bridge are grandfathered since they were built to Code at the time they were installed but are not up to today's standards and truck sizes. He stated that the three priorities that Council should consider are 1) increasing bridge height/width to more easily accommodate a ladder truck, 2) adding fire hydrants, and 3) widening the road since it is currently only 14 feet wide. Mayor Rockvam asked if the Hennepin County Regional Rail Authority (HCRRA) was open to leasing, selling, or donating land to widen the road. City Engineer Hare responded that HCRRA has said they would be open to leasing or selling land. However, HCRRA noted that the land has been listed as a potential light rail expansion area. While this particular expansion is highly unlikely, HCRRA did mention this potential future project in regards to an easement. Council Member Hughes stated that residents have voiced concerns about traffic speed increasing, especially on the sharp corner, if the center bridge pillar is removed. City Engineer Hare responded that there are ways to stripe and sign the road to help calm traffic. Mayor Rockvam stated he was in favor of separating the bridge project from the proposed water and sewer improvements. City Engineer Hare responded that based on the types of contractors that would be bidding on the water and sewer project, the bridge would need to be a separate bid process anyway. Council Member Chase was in favor of splitting the projects for bidding, moving forward with the water and sewer improvements including adding fire hydrants, looking for a solution to increase the height/width of the bridge, and receiving more data on the proposed road improvement project. He further mentioned that he believes road projects should be on a schedule and be more of a data - driven decision instead of just basing all road projects on public opinion at the time. Council Member Hoffman agreed with Council Member Chase and asked what the cost savings is for trenching versus sliplining. City Engineer Hare responded that they are comparable costs with an open road but West Arm Road West is not an open road so the outliers are the shoreline area and front yard issues because the project needs to be as minimally invasive as possible. He stated that trenching would potentially bring 10-20% cost savings. The City Council consensus was to move forward with water and sewer improvements including adding fire hydrants, look into the option of leasing or buying HCRRA land to widen the road, and researching an option to increase the height/width of the bridge for fire truck access. City Administrator Tolsma stated he wanted to discuss the financial decisions for the proposed projects including bonding options. Council Member Hoffman asked if the City currently depreciates its assets in order to build a replacement fund for its infrastructure. City Administrator Tolsma responded that the depreciation is accounted for in regards to the City's water and sewer infrastructure. There is currently some money in the cash reserves for water improvements. However, sewer improvements hadn't been depreciated and accounted for in many years and that was not changed with a rate increase until just a couple of years ago. City Administrator Tolsma stated that a financial decision does not need to be made tonight but he wants to the Council to start thinking about options. He stated that while there may be enough money in cash reserves to cover the West Arm Road West water and sewer improvements, but that it would be the last major project that could potentially be paid with cash reserves until there is another bond and refunding resolution. Mayor Rockvam asked for City Administrator Tolsma to send the City Council the current amount in the City's cash reserves so they can be more informed when making their decision. City Administrator Tolsma stated that rates are low right now and the Council needs to decide what sort of financial position the City would like to be in. He added that if the cash reserves are used for the project it basically is being paid for by residents that have lived here for quite some time and built up that reserve fund. Whereas, if the City bonds for the project it is paid for by current and future residents since they will be seeing the benefits of the project. This is philosophical question that the Council will need to decide. City Administrator Tolsma discussed resident notification and outreach options especially once the project gets closer. He added that the normal process of having an open house is complicated by the current COVID-19 pandemic so alternative options are being discussed. Mayor Rockvam discussed the option of renting a larger space because he believes projects of this type need to be discussed and presented in person. Council Member Chase brought up the idea of having a video presentation prepared for distribution before an in -person meeting. He believes this option could answer many questions ahead of time to make the in -person meeting as efficient as possible. The City Council discussed notification options including video presentations, an online open house, renting a larger space for an in -person meeting, and distributing printed brochures. Mayor Rockvam would like the Council to give serious thought to the Public Works contract and getting into a long-term agreement with the City of Orono once the PeopleService contract expires. The City Council consensus was they would like to see bids to compare service options and pricing. City Administrator Tolsma responded that starting a proposal process early is good for all parties involved. He added that he will contact Orono, Mound, and PeopleService to discuss interest, possible services that could be provided, and a timeline for proposals. 5. MISCELLANEOUS — None. 6. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned by unanimous consent at 6:25 p.m. Date Approved: July 20, 2020 Dan Tolsma, City Administrator Theresa Schyma, City Clerk SPRING PARK onLake �+inn•tonk CITY OF SPRING PARK CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 6, 2020 - 7:00 PM SPRING PARK CITY HALL 1. CALL TO ORDER - The special meeting was called to order by Mayor Rockvam at 7:00 p.m. Council Members Jerome P. Rockvam, Mayor; Mark Chase; Jeff Hoffman; Pamela Horton; and Present: Gary Hughes Staff Present: Dan Tolsma, City Administrator; and Theresa Schyma, City Clerk 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE — Mayor Rockvam led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. 3. ADOPT MEETING AGENDA Council Member Hughes requested to delete Item #13C since the meeting has been cancelled. M/Hughes, S/Horton to adopt the meeting agenda as amended. Motion carried 5-0. 4. ADOPT CONSENT AGENDA a. City Council Work Session Meeting Minutes from June 15, 2020 b. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes from June 15, 2020 c. Resolution 20-15: Supporting Electronic Payment Options for City Hall Customers d. Back Channel Brewery Artimer Market Special Events 20-05 Quly 29), 20-06 (August 26), & 20-07 (September 30) & Temporary On -Sale Liquor Licenses Council Member Chase asked about the fees associated with Item #4c. City Clerk Schyma responded that all "convenience fees" for utilizing the electronic payment service would be prominently displayed online so that customers would be aware of any fees prior to using the service. M/Horton, S/Hoffman to adopt the Consent Agenda. Motion carried 5-0. 5. PUBLIC FORUM Gretchen Piper, candidate for Minnesota Senate District 33, introduced herself to the Council and discussed current issues in the community. Michael Mason, 3950 Del Otero Avenue, commented on the upcoming projects on West Arm Road West. He wanted the Council to look into the timing of increasing the height/width of the bridge in relation to the start of other improvement projects on West Arm Road West. 6. PRESENTATIONS & GUEST SPEAKERS — None. 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS — None. 8. PETITIONS, REQUESTS, & APPLICATIONS — None. 9. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS — None. 10. REPORTS OF OFFICERS AND COMMITTEES a. Mayor & Council — None. b. City Staff — None. c. Contract Staff — None. 11. NEW BUSINESS & COMMUNICATIONS — None. 12. CLAIMS FOR PAYMENT a. July 6, 2020 Claims M/Horton, S/Chase to approve all claims for payment. Motion carried 5-0. 13. UPCOMING MEETINGS & TRAINING a. July 8 — LMCD Work Session at 6:00 PM with Regular Meeting at 7:00 PM b. July 8 — Planning Commission — 6:00 PM d. July 20 — City Council Work Session at 6:00 PM with Regular Meeting at 7:00 PM e. July 22 — Police Commission — 8:00 AM f. July 22 — Fire Commission — 11:00 AM g. July 22 — LMCD Work Session at 6:00 PM with Regular Meeting at 7:00 PM 14. MISCELLANEOUS (INFORMATION ONLY a. Mound Fire Department May Report 15. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned by unanimous consent at 7:13 p.m. Date Approved: July 20, 2020 Dan Tolsma, City Administrator Theresa Schyma, City Clerk yd SPRING PARK anLake arm.eronk STAFF MEMO 2413 BLACK LAKE ROAD VARIANCE EXTENSTION REQUEST 1. BACKGROUND: The Council approved a variance at their August 20, 2018 meeting to allow for the construction of a garage at 2413 Black Lake Road. Once a variance is approved it must be implemented within one year from the date of approval, however, if the applicant is unable to complete the project within the one-year window, they may request a one-year extension from the City Council. The property owner requested an extension in June 2019 and was granted a one-year extension by the City Council. Due to employment and economic reasons the property owner was not able to initiate work on the variance this past year and has submitted a formal extension request on June 22, 2020 for another one-year term that would expire on August 20, 2021. Additionally, the City Code states that the extension request must first be reviewed by the Planning Commission before Council action is taken. The Planning Commission reviewed the extension request at their July 8, 2020 meeting and unanimously recommended approval of the extension. 2. RECOMMENDED ACTION: By Motion: Approve the variance for another one-year term with a new deadline of August 20, 2021. (`Sa NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 4800 Olson Memorial Highway, Suite 202, Golden Valley, MN 55422 Telephone: 763.231.2555 Facsimile: 763.231.2561 plan ners(,&nacplanning.com PLANNING REPORT TO: Dan Tolsma FROM: Alan Brixius / Daniel Elder DATE: July 1, 2020 RE: Spring Park — Variance request — Street Side Setback 4364 & 4368 West Arm Road FILE NO: 175.01 — 20.03 PID: 181-172-343-0057 & 181-172-343-0058 BACKGROUND: Duane Myers of Myers Construction Management is applying on behalf of Barbara & Andrew Ward and is requesting a street side setback variance for the expansion of a two-family dwelling unit located at 4364 & 4368 West Arm Road. The variance is needed for the improvement and expansion of the two family dwelling to allow a 20' street side setback on the south side of the property. Attached for reference: Exhibit A: Application Materials Exhibit B: Applicant Narrative Exhibit C: Site Survey Exhibit D: Site Plan Exhibit E: Property Aerial Photo Exhibit F: Easement Document ISSUES AND ANALYSIS Existing Site Challenges The property is located within an R-1, Single Family and Two -Family Residential District. The twinhomes are a permitted use in the R-1 zoning district. The physical practical difficulty unique to the twinhome properties along West Arm Road is a 15' street easement (see Exhibit F). This easement only applies to the twinhome lots and no other lots along West Arm Road. The twinhomes are located 60' from West Arm Road surface pavement and are currently located 45' from the easement (see Exhibit F). Other homes along West Arm Road have lessor setbacks with garages closer to the street than applicant's property. The net impervious surface on the site after the addition will exceed 30% of the total lot area in hardcover. Hard cover between 30% and 40% is allowed provide a storm water management plan designed for the site. Setbacks and Lot Requirements: The following table outlines the R-1 District standards for lot area and setbacks compared against the existing conditions on the lot in question: R-1 District Existing Proposed: Compliant: Code: Conditions: Lot Requirements: Lot Area 12,000 sq. ft. 14,348 sq. ft. * N / A Yes Two -Family both lots Dwelling* Lot Width 50 ft. 68 ft. * both N / A Yes lots Lot Coverage 30 percent 3,368 sq. ft. 4,568 sq. ft. Yes * With (23.4%) * both (31.8.%) *both Conditions lots lots Setback Requirements: Required Existing Proposed Right -of -Way 30 ft. 45ft (approx. 20 ft. (approx.) No Setback off easement) off of *60ft off West easement Arm Road 35ft. from West Arm Road Pavement Side Yard 10 ft. 10.35 ft. 10.35 ft. Yes Setback west Side Yard 10 ft. 6.45 ft. 6.45 No * Existing Setback east Condition Setback from 50 ft. 106 ft. 106 ft. Yes OHWL The new garage is not be complaint due to the 15' easement on the property and would be located 20' from the easement. It would however be 35' from West Arm Road paved street surface. VARIANCE REVIEW CRITERIA The applicants have applied for a variance to allow a street side setback encroachment for the construction of an addition to the twinhomes. The City of Spring Park zoning ordinance outlines the following criteria when considering a variance: Variances from the literal provisions of the chapter in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration not resulting from the actions of an individual, and where it is demonstrated that such variance will be in keeping with reasonable use and the spirit and intent of the chapter. (a) In considering any request for a variance and in taking subsequent action, planning commission and the city council, serving as the board of adjustment and appeals, shall make a finding of fact that the granting of such variance will not: (1) Impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property. Staff Comment: The expansion is taking place on an area of the property that will not impact the supply of light and air to adjacent properties. (2) Unreasonably increase the congestion in the public streets. Staff Comment: The proposed use is an expansion to the existing twinhomes and is not expected to increase traffic in the immediate area over existing conditions. (3) Increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety. Staff Comment: The building is not expected to increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety. (4) Unreasonably diminish or impair established property values within the neighborhood, or in any other way be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Staff Comment: The expansion to the twinhomes will be very similar in nature to neighboring properties and should not diminish or impair property values. The variances will create conditions similar to other non- conforming setbacks in the neighborhood. As shown is Exhibit E the new setback from the right-of-way will still exceed garage setbacks of existing homes along West Arm Road. Approval of the variance request is not expected to diminish or impair property values. 3 (5) Violate the intent and purpose of the city comprehensive plan. Staff Comment: The Spring Park Comprehensive Plan states in Strategy 2 that it will promote the renovation and reinvestment in existing homes is a priority for the city. The expansion of the twinhomes will allow for the renovation and reinvestment in the community (b) A variance from the requirements of this chapter shall be permitted only when: (1) Special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district: a. Special conditions may include exceptional topographic or water conditions or, in the case of an existing lot or parcel record, narrowness, shallowness or shape of the property. Staff Comment. The subject lot is subject to a 15' street easement as shown in Exhibit F that is exclusive to the twinhome lots and is not on other properties along West Arm Road. The building addition will maintain a 20 foot setback from the easement and a 35 foot setback from the paved road surface which is similar or greater to other properties along West Arm Road. b. Special conditions and circumstances may not be primarily economic in nature. Staff Comment. The subject site is requesting a variance due to the 15' easement. Economic conditions are not considered to be the primary reason for the variance requests. (2) Literal interpretation of the provisions of this chapter would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by owners of other properties in the same district under the terms of this chapter. Staff Comment: The applicants request is very similar to the pattern of adjoining homes in the neighborhood. The properties to the east of the subject site include homes that are very similar to the proposed addition. These homes are not subject to the 15' street easement and contain similar or lesser setbacks than the applicant's proposal for the garages. 4 (3) The special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant. Staff Comment: The 15' easement is a special condition is not a result of the property owner's actions. (4) Granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district. Staff Comment: The proposal is an attached garage and additional living space, are permitted uses in the R-1 zoning district in the City. The aerial photo shows that the applicant is requesting a similar pattern to that of adjoining homes. (b) Application for a variance shall set forth reasons that the variance is justified in order to make reasonable use of the land, structure or building, and that the variance requested is the minimum variance from the provisions of this chapter. Staff Comment: The easement is unique to the four twinhome properties on West Arm Road. Absent this easement the twinhomes will have a setback of 35' from West Arm Road surface pavement. (c) A variance may be granted when the applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance without a variance. Finding: As discussed, the easement created challenges in the construction of the addition without requiring a variance to the street setback. The easement is unique to the four twinhome parcels on West Arm Road. Neighboring properties not encumbered by the street easement, have garages closer to West Arm Road than the applicants requested variance. The applicant request will maintain a 20 foot setback from the easement and will be 35 feet from West Arm Road paved surface. Absent the easement the townhome would meet the required street side setback. Practical difficulties with this variance request are not solely related to economic considerations, and given that garages are an allowed accessory use in the zoning district, would not change the essential character of the neighborhood. Drainage and Impervious Surface: Sec 42-279 Lot coverage. Impervious surface coverage of lots within the R-1 districts shall not exceed 30 percent of the lot area, except as provided below: b. New construction, alterations, expansions and remodeling of structures on all lots may expand lot coverage up to 40 percent of actual lot area through the plan review process established in article IV, division 1, provided the following stipulations are met: All structures, additions, or expansions shall meet setback and other requirements of this chapter. The lot shall be served by municipal sewer and water. iii. The lot shall provide for the collection and treatment of stormwater in compliance with the city stormwater management plan if determined that the site improvements will result in increased runoff directly entering a public water. All development plans shall require review and approval by the city engineer and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. iv. Measures to be taken for the treatment of stormwater runoff and/or prevention of stormwater from directly entering a public water. The measures may include, but not be limited to the following: (A) Appurtenances as sedimentation basins, debris basins, desilting basins or silt traps. (B) Installation of debris guards and microsilt basins on storm sewer inlets. (C) Use where practical, oil skimming devices or sump catch basins. (D) Direct drainage away from the lake and into previous, grassed, yards through site grading, use of gutters and downspouts. (E) Construct sidewalks and driveways of partially pervious raised materials such as decking which has natural earth or other previous material beneath or between the planking. (F) Use grading and construction techniques which encourage rapid infiltration, e.g. sand and gravel under impervious materials with adjacent infiltration swales graded to lead into them. (G) Install berms, water bars, or terraces which temporarily detain water before dispersing it into previous area. Staff Comment: As a condition of the variance request the applicant will need to provide a Stormwater Management Plan in order to meet the City's code for construction that exceeds 30% impervious surface. The current proposal has an estimated 31.8% impervious surface. The storm water management plan must identify the proposed drainage patterns and storm water treatment features per the city code. Said plan shall be subject to City Engineer review and approval. RECOMMENDATION: Based on the findings of this report there is justification for the requested street side variance. Based on the findings of this report staff recommends that the variance requests be approved based upon the following recommendations. Construction will not deviate from the site plan submitted to the city on 6/9/2020 as part of the variance application. Any change to the dimensions of the addition would be subject to a separate review. All new exterior finishes shall match in color and material type to the existing home. 2. Given that the amount of impervious surface at the site will exceed 30%, the applicant will need to meet the conditions outlined in Sec. 42-279 b. in order to mitigate the stormwater impacts of the addition. If the applicant can show that the impervious surface is less than 30% they can forgo this stipulation. The applicant will submit a separate site grading and drainage plan to ensure proper stormwater management practices. This plan will be subject to review and approval by the city engineer. CC: Theresa Schyma Scott Qualle Brian Hare Duane Myers Barbara Ward Andrew Ward 7 yers anstruction ,ainagement "Guiding your way" REASONS TO APPROVE THE REQUESTED VARIANCE TO SHORTEN THE REAR YARD SETBACK REQUIREMENT FOR' THE PROPERTIES IN QUESTION: 1. The remodeling of these two properties is permitted under existing code statutes. 2. The two parcels with twin homes are unique to this neighborhood (SEE ATTACHED HENNEPIN COUNTY MAP) and both have an existing easement requiring an additional 15' in setback from the paved road. No other property in the neighborhood is encumbered in this fashion. 3. The planned extension on the existing garage areas (25�, will allow for additional living space on the main level as well as new living space above the garages. It will also allow the homeowners to park inside the garage with newer vehicles which are longer and higher than the existing garages will allow. It will also create parking areas in front of the newly extended garages which would be approximately 20' from the existing easement and approximately 35' from the paved road. 4. This proposed setback will not encumber the existing easement, and will still be greater in comparison to many of the setbacks of other properties along West Arm Road. 5. This variance (if granted) will not alter the character of the neighborhood, will not cause hardship to any of the other properties along the road, and will also increase the value of both properties being remodeled. General Contractors License #BC631489 1411 Lancaster Avenue S. * St. Louis Park, MN 55426 • Phone: 612-801-5544 • Fax: 952- 545-0583 duane@myersconst.net C www.myersconst.net Exhibit A FRANK R. CARDARELLE Lana surveyor, Inc. Land Surveyor (952 ) 941-3031 6440 Flying Cloud Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 (Cer of ira tt let �surucy .T Survey For Cameron a Diane Cross Book Page Flle�_ 4368 West Arm Road Spring Park, MN 55384 Scale: 1`-30' e Denotes Iron Mon.Found I �o 9V 404372 �'el ° ep d '� 1O6 j ,00 4 tr 9 0 --- AL.3 �� •� Ask � q3Q'. No'0 ` I 2.s.F � �04..ur1 t d � w'ao-r =Ac ...........�� B NOe7f1E � i wozz a Des crri ti�on: -of- That pert of Lot 19, Block1 2, Townsite of Langdon Park lying Northerly of the Northerly right-of- way line of West Arm Road, except the Westerly 40 feet thereof and except the Easterly 96.3 feet thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. This plat, specification or report was prepared by me or under y direc supervision, (nd that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota ig ed I th day oi] October,2004. Frank R. ar a ate eg. cense No. Exhibit B CD rn w 6O'-3;- j_ - PROPERTY UNE - - I av o z oZ � v zZ F- P � / 46 / - � % •° h�yT�lN�� A L44AL Mi4-WVTI0N d.Acs-IT7 ?"-u M Ll40— i'rIA SGUTH r-uev. .TION >�. ia•.I-A NOF TH rLE VArI ON y -: W. I'_' �_ �= Tt L. CAYG6 coNsr. 1 Av 4 Exhibit C L O W 6 P\ PLOO F� rAag • • Z Exhibit D "-7-, !soot IN.!^ PLAN 5i-1�' 9wo .Wx.LT «ullrllts rl r6f \�e Itm rov_ rw. uIc ra�owmu t-fub o`"Au' maniys 3 sR"Ir� Lx4 xws w'e.G `"s. n�Sld" 'IM1K - x wwlar c oac .,oNs, p» 40rpi u/.Mac. HMe- .. ewt U✓ 64• bl0 WWMIMI fglwy p{/SO "1�saW lYx. �1'LfICN 4G V ww. W� y E%to exrr. rty At cox Rv*w cRo9G SDOf I014 or<bp Ye+f I %PJ cm.4L rk- 4. s W/ IRD sld. -Mir. 7DTA I'L 8 p0 u9t..e VMIDLLIn6i5 KKR MIN n Exhibd C r�j 9P e TI, po" + 0 K f, ;Qj L , F4 4 1 WV114e, SO&A EZVFAMA IL DO LJIDL.P_ 9WE544,W615 L 0 W BP. fL 0 0. "Z M E C" A N I C/,L- Exhibit C -lIal:w 19N19V9 two q�b 9A- ��I II.J(IIj�Iryul ys r 7t e4 •i M tr�Y16 Yr0 �..Y�1 — __. r_a ca E_'�31 _ 1 pF �' _ III XA �013 �Ly rn. s.ibi I n» i� m www . I 1.....—. I - Of a � P Q N�ivwM O / d � » rRgd»o IAT p�rww onrw / J� N i � �rYeMMO UMT II R'P�RVKIW U^r6 M 77' uYwro•so war I LL[TAL DE!cf�IpTra�l L— iI e- - ILA r M,,z of LN,f — F/t4,, WfF '4 HezieRl..Y 40D f fr TNCI'G LF � R'ENE III'��i311= jOYTN GLE VAT ION . Ye = I'- " N O R f H E L E V A T I O N w—: _ 7. G. WY[ Exhibit C IU17 OAP44 o MOP, wY7 ars.a�.o V..K t�•�Mc I�rs.cG 4. .P L► L� L ` +` P c � -,4i _- 9 w• 4 I •JL I \ YIL — �V IL s� � S I I ' K b rlx� ❑ ❑ I I I I DMIN4 Man y I qy FQOA I. 2 y,. 1j 12%jp. N ILY7G I i�Mb Pro% FAL- d b Y_ r li- � •,o. tee' _l o LI-O' L oWEK FLOoP) UPPtiR r-LOOFN ExhibR C J I .ro II-O' L , 9AvaD Aa I .uG__ I— .— —_ — _— .-- .— _ .9mo i•1NE -- �� _�oattN4 PLhN saga: Y4+i-e IR aoc R.b.. fL' ewN N•AKMbN - "Y i•coe wvb pane 'k' MG. eKo. tx>fsu.Y olLAII- a a,• +�,� o�tis fYlo JON�s Ic"aa MIIDl.W�. R'aaV• RNR. ,Ilbuunai? cao�c sIwN4 rlf RoLL.. 'fir e,Tlux- �✓ 44%bb M1VNM+1 (apby YI1T0 MY�W �LfItIJ ,Lrr- 9• Lb ersu.l.r AI ro UIt. R saw Y1 Pa�T i-w4 L4•e4 LR04i SlGf.oli_ JGIL VL•. I-�' Ix f1 1'�N'.Mp VMf 64 }t.MM1 W1 IK5 • 5rn1I. ' "A G IkfA 1'L .A ya u91-.6 DWELL INf15 44LQ 7 a Iro• i►XE` MIN N Ex d.anmA. Pt wu fA&V- CAL PLWI L oW EFl �LOOIi M Er—QAN ICAL. ri 0 N!4-3 -11 V-L ad J.2 N 19 y;;, ilk-1 —441 a- .mum PARCEL ID: 1811723430057 OWNER NAME: Barbara K Ward PARCEL ADDRESS:4364 West Arm Rd, Spring Park MN 55384 PARCEL AREA: 0.15 acres, 6,342 sq ft A-T-B: Torrens SALE PRICE: $190,0000 SALE DATA: 01/1998 SALE CODE: Warranty Deed ASSESSED 2019, PAYABLE 2020 PROPERTY TYPE: Residential -Zero Lot Line HOMESTEAD: Homestead MARKET VALUE: $523,000 TAX TOTAL: $7,006.36 Comments: V This data (1) Is furnishad 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (Ik) is notsuitable for legal, engl nearing orsurveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be lade for any damage, Injuryorloss resulting from this data. COPYRIGHT ® HENNEPIN ASSESSED 2020, PAYABLE 2021 COUNTY 2020 PROPERTY TYPE: Residential -zero Lot Line HOMESTEAD: Homestead MARKET VALUE: $658,000 Exhibit D I � Fro � I �•a�l i� Ia�l r— �`, lil L1J 40, Ul to 01 �w0 I W. 1+.I J K� 31' I 5- N LINE. S 15 W31FT, E96.3FT.� LOT 19, EXCEPT RR ROAD EASEMENT PER a DOC. NO. 4605739 (t NORTH 0 50 SCALE IN FEET L _ J DENOTES UTILITY EASEMENT ROAD EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 4605512 WEST ARM ROAD (HENNEPIN COUNTY RR AUTHORITY) CITY OF SPRING PARK Designed_ Exhibit Number DrdwI %Mb&k STORM SEWER Approved: d Approved: nose WEST ARM ROAD Issued. 10n7/zm5 . www.sambatek.com EASEMENT EXHIBIT Rev" Englneering 1 Surveying 1 Plenning 1 Environmental Date: Project Nu.SPR20097.41 Exhibit E RESOLUTION NO. 20-16 CITY OF SPRING PARK COUNTY OF HENNEPIN STATE OF MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION ADDRESSING VARIANCES FOR A STREET SIDE SETBACK LOCATED AT 4364 AND 4368 WEST ARM ROAD WITHIN THE CITY OF SPRING PARK WHEREAS, Barbara and Andrew Ward (the "Applicant") have applied for a street side setback variances for the expansion of the two-family dwelling at their property located at 4364 and 4368 West Arm Road (the "Property") in the City of Spring Park (the "City"); and WHEREAS, The Property Owners of 4364 and 4368 West Arm Road are seeking a street side variance to bring a building addition within 20 feet of the street easement of West Arm Road: and WHEREAS, the City ordinance requires that lots in the R-1 district have a setback of 30 feet for street side setbacks; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Spring Park held a public meeting on July 8, 2020 to consider the application materials, the planning report of July 1, 2020, and hear public testimony. Upon closing the public hearing, the Planning Commission recommended the City Council approve the variance for a street side setback base on the findings and recommendations outlined in the July 1, 2020 planning report as amended by the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Spring Park City Council has received the Applicant's application, the July 1, 2020 planning report, and the Planning Commission recommendation, and agrees with the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission based on the findings outlined in the July 1, 2020 planning reports. NOW, THEREFORE BE IF RESOLVED, that the City Council of Spring Park, Minnesota hereby approves the requested street side setback as illustrated in the site plans dated June 9, 2020 and based on the findings outlined in the July 1, 2020 planning reports subject to the following conditions: Construction will not deviate from the site plan submitted to the city on 6/8/2020 as part of the variance application. Any change to the dimensions of the addition would be subject to a separate review. All new exterior finishes shall match in color and material type to the existing home 2. All runoff from the building and driveway shall be directed away to storm sewer subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Spring Park this 20th day of July 2020. ATTEST: 0 Theresa Schyma, City Clerk CITY OF SPRING PARK Jerome Rockvam, Mayor 2 mo NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 4800 Olson Memorial Highway, Suite 202, Golden Valley, MN 55422 Telephone: 763.231.2555 Facsimile: 763.231.2561 plan ners!anacplanning.com PLANNING REPORT TO: Dan Tolsma FROM: Alan Brixius / Daniel Elder DATE: July 1, 2020 RE: Spring Park — Variance request — Side yard setback 4317 Channel Road FILE NO: 175.01 — 20.02 .s BACKGROUND: 1911723120033 Patrick & Hannah Berry, homeowners in the City of Spring Park, are seeking a variance from the R-1 district side yard setback requirement for their property at 4317 Channel Rd. This variance is needed for the construction of a 3-car attached garage with additional living space on the second floor on the northern and western portion of their property. The property is located within an R-1, Single Family and Two -Family Residential District. Due to the layout of the site, challenges exist in meeting the side -yard setback. In addition, the net impervious surface on the site after the addition would have some conditions for stormwater management to meet city standards. Attached for reference: Exhibit A: Application Material Exhibit B: Applicant Narrative Exhibit C: Site Survey Exhibit D: Site Plan Exhibit E : Building Official Email ISSUES AND ANALYSIS Existing Site Challenges As illustrated in Exhibit C this property is in a neighborhood of the city that presents a number of challenges due to the physical characteristics of the lots and adjacent streets. The applicant's lot area of 9,165 sq. ft. falls below the required lot area of 10,000 sq. ft. and the 48 ft lot width does not meet the lot width requirements of the R-1 zoning district. The existing home has a non -conforming setback on the western side yard of 3 feet but is complaint on the all the other setbacks. The current garage has a zero setback from the west lot line and is setback 10.6 ft from Channel Road as shown in Exhibit C. The applicants have proposed removal of the garage and the construction of a 3-car garage and living area extension connecting to the home. This proposal will improve the garage setbacks that exist on the property currently. Setbacks and Lot Requirements: The following table outlines the R-1 District standards for lot area and setbacks compared against the existing conditions on the lot in question: R-1 District Existing --7 Proposed: Compliant: Code: Conditions: Lot Requirements: Lot Area 10,000 sq. ft. 9,165 sq. ft. N / A No * Existing Single- Condition Family* Lot Width 50 ft. 48 ft. N / A No Lot Coverage 30 percent 3,316 sq. ft. 3,632 sq. ft. No * 40% is (36.18%) (39.62%) allowed with SMP Setback Re uirements: House Garage Right -of -Way 30 ft. 73ft 10.6ft 41 ft. (approx.) Yes Setback (approx.)( (approx.) Side Yard 10 ft. 3.1 ft. 1 ft 3.1 ft. No Setback west (approx.) Side Yard 10 ft. 19.2 ft. 31 ft 19.2 Yes Setback east Setback from 50 ft. 58.1 ft. 93.7 ft 58.1 ft. Yes OHWL (approx. 2 The table above shows the required amount of setback that a structure must meet in R- 1 districts, compared to the proposed setbacks that will be left after the construction of the addition. The new addition requires variances from the required side setback on west lot line. VARIANCE REVIEW CRITERIA Section 42-165 of the Spring Park ordinance states that the purpose for establishing a variance process is to provide: • Variances from the literal provisions of the chapter in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration not resulting from the actions of an individual, and where it is demonstrated that such variance will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the chapter. (a) In considering any request for a variance and in taking subsequent action, planning commission and the city council, serving as the board of adjustment and appeals, shall make a finding of fact that the granting of such variance will not: (1) Impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property. Staff Comment: The expansion that is taking place will not impact the supply of light and air to adjacent properties. (2) Unreasonably increase the congestion in the public streets. Staff Comment: The proposed use continues to be a permitted single family home. The addition of an attached garage and additional living space and is not expected to increase traffic in the immediate area. (3) Increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety. Staff Comment: The purposed use is not expected to increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety. The location of the new garage will improve traffic safety by providing better sight lines, access and egress to the property. Buildings within 5' or less of a lot line are required to meet the special building and fire code requirements per the building officials' comments outlined in Exhibit E (4) Unreasonably diminish or impair established property values within the neighborhood, or in any other way be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Staff Comment: The addition of an attached garage and living space will be very similar in nature to neighboring properties and will add value to the home and property. In addition, the applicant notes that the current garage is in a dilapidated state the new garage and living area would increase the property value. In addition, the garage setbacks from the right-of-way and side yards shall increase. Approval of the variance request is not expected to diminish or impair property values. (5) Violate the intent and purpose of the city comprehensive plan. Staff Comment: The Spring Park 2040 Comprehensive Plan states in Strategy 2 that it will promote the renovation and reinvestment in existing homes is a priority for the city. The teardown of the garage and expansion of the home will allow for the renovation and reinvestment in the community. In addition, the proposed plan will bring the property into compliance with the street side setback going from 10.6 ft to 41 ft. (b) A variance from the requirements of this chapter shall be permitted only when: • The requested variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance Finding: A garage and home addition is an allowed use in an R-1 district within the City of Spring Park as stated in section 42-277 of the city code. And while the addition will not meet side yard setback requirements for the zoning district it does improve on the existing setback condition of the current garage. The proposed garage would bring the property into compliance with the street side setback going from less than 1 ft to 41 ft. The west side yard setback while not in full compliance it will increase the garage setback from 0.8 ft to 3 ft. The finds this to a reasonable use of property. (c) No variance shall be granted that would allow any use that is not permitted in the zoning district in which the subject property is located. Finding: A house/garage are allowed uses in an R-1 district within the City of Spring Park as stated in section 42-277 of the city code. M (d) A variance may be granted when the applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance without a variance. Finding: As discussed, the size and shape of the parcel create numerous challenges in the construction of a home addition without requiring a variance for the lot setbacks. The proposed project will reduce the degree of non- conformity for the garage. The increased street side setback improves traffic conditions along Channel Road. Practical difficulties with this variance request are not solely related to economic considerations, and given that garages are an allowed accessory use in the zoning district, would not change the essential character of the neighborhood. Lot Coverage: The building addition expands hardcover on the applicant's property to 39.62% impervious surface. However, in Sec. 42-279 of the City Code, Lot Requirements and Setbacks, conditions are outlined in which new construction can be allowed to have up to a 40% impervious surface by meeting the following conditions. The lot shall provide for the collection and treatment of stormwater in compliance with the city stormwater management plan if determined that the site improvements will result in increased runoff directly entering a public water. All development plans shall require review and approval by the city engineer. The property owner shall be responsible for installing one or more of the measures recommended by the city engineer to mitigate the impact of additional impervious surface. Plans must also be reviewed by the Minnehaha Creek watershed district when projects meet criteria requiring watershed district review and approval. 2. Measures to be taken for the treatment of stormwater runoff and/or prevention of stormwater from directly entering a public water. The measures may include, but not be limited to the following: • Installation of rain gardens, infiltration basins, or bio filtration basins should be considered for treatment of stormwater runoff from hard surfaces. Filtration basins should be considered if soil conditions are not favorable for infiltration. • Installation of erosion control devices, including silt fence, bio-rolls, erosion control blanket, and storm sewer inlet protection should be used. • Installation of oil -skimming devices and sump catch basins should be used to improve water quality. 5 • Stormwater runoff from hard surfaces should be directed into pervious areas (grassed lawns or landscape beds) through site grading and use of gutters and downspouts. • Hard surfaces should be constructed using pervious pavement or pavers, or raised materials such as decking which has natural earth or other pervious material beneath or between the planking. • Grading and construction techniques should be implemented that encourage infiltration of stormwater runoff. • Installation of berms or basins should be considered to temporarily detain water before dispersing it into pervious area. Comment: The applicant will need to provide a Stormwater Management Plan in order to meet the City's code for construction that exceeds 30% impervious surface. The current proposal has 39.62% impervious surface. The applicant has noted they will be adding a storm management rain garden or swale. The building plans will also need to address gutter and drainage from the site. Staff is concerned that roof drainage my impact the property to the west. As a condition of variance approval the property owner shall install gutters and down spouts that will collect roof drainage and divert it away from the property to the west. The stormwater management plan shall show drainage patterns and location and design of the rain garden and or swale per approval of City Engineer. RECOMMENDATION: In reviewing this application, staff has evaluated the variance request against the Spring Park's Code of Ordinances, as well as Minnesota State Statute 462.357 regarding Land Use Variances. Both documents outline the necessity of it being a reasonable use of the property and an existing practical difficulties in the normal development of a property, in order for a variance from those ordinances to be granted. Based on the findings outlined in the report; staff finds that the proposed variance offers reasonable use of the property and there are practical difficulties unique to the property that warrant variance considerations. Based on the variance findings of this report staff recommends approval of the applicants request for a variance from the side setback requirements for the property at 4317 Channel Road with the following conditions. Construction will not deviate from the site plan submitted to the city on 6/2/2020 as part of the variance application. Any change to the dimensions of the addition would be subject to a separate review. f: 2. The applicant will have to demonstrate building plans that meet the building inspectors and state requirements for buildings within five feet of a lot line. These requirements are outlined in Exhibit E. 3. Given that the amount of impervious surface at the site will exceed 30%, the applicant will need to meet the conditions outlined in Sec. 42-279 (4) b. in order to mitigate the stormwater impacts of the addition. • The applicant will submit a separate site grading and drainage plan to ensure proper stormwater management practices. This plan will be subject to review and approval by the city engineer. • The applicant shall install a gutters and down spouts to direct runoff away from the adjacent properties and into one of the storm water management options listed in sec. 42-279. 4. Additional recommendations by City staff CC: Theresa Schyma Scott Qualle Brian Hare Patrick Berry Hannah Berry 7 Attachment to Berry Variance Application 4317 Channel Road June 2, 2020 DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Existing Use of Property: We purchased this home as our primary residence in March of 2020. It includes a detached, 1 car garage which is set back from the street by only 11 feet and less than 1 foot from the neighbor's property to the west. The garage is non-functional and in terrible condition. It is possibly dangerous structurally and frankly, is an eyesore for the neighborhood. We are required to park our cars and store some personal items outside. Although we love the charm of the current house, it does not include a master bedroom suite. Nature of Proposed Use: We propose the removal of the existing garage and replacing it with an attached 3 gar garage with a master bedroom suite above it. Reason(s) to Approve the Request: We will be significantly improving the street setback to approximately 41 feet (exceeding current requirements) and increasing the setback from our neighbor's property from less than 1 foot to approximately 3 feet (which is the setback of the existing house). We will be adding a storm management rain garden or swale as per current requirements. In addition to the technical improvements, this addition to our home will be a beautiful structure which will replace a dilapidated street -side structure. Exhibit A cop to of wairver for - Nate Richter 4317 Channel Road Spring Park. MN 55384 �R— G Greta nail Ys�D — — ►r In �IaGaP GNAN 3°1 is .6 - - S ,4g.Q0 \ nail ��•— \ etGonG�te c in b19 i� ,83 L4c�Top z2_=\ cs v ,gy a —0.8 \ �4 \O vo \ m DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY; Lot 3, SUBDIVISION OF LOT I SKARP w AND LINDQUIST'S ROSE HILL. Hennepin � 1 • County, Minnesota. IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE EXISTING !-LOUSE: 1,147 s.f. GARAGE: 365 s.f. BLACKTOP: 1,118 s.f CONCRETE SIDEWALK. 285 s.f. NEIGHBORS CONC. 76.s.f PAVER SIDEWALK: 71 s.f. DECK: 254 s.f. TOTAL IMPERVIOUS: 3,316 s.f. I LOT AREA (TO OHKq 9,165 s.f. IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE: 36.18 LEGEND • Found Iron Monument o Set 1/2" X 14" Iron Pipe w m 23.5 ---- �4 - C ', ' flE�K N t � t r N y m y o m i O O y -► � t w O t w ty� ► y t y ► y 1 ap �a yy E A SH RREYED o7�7/� e + SU ►i OH�I } LAKE ELEVATION 1� 1 ON 6114117 = 930.2 OHW = 929.4 1� 1 , SHORELINE d STY LINE OF LOT ? PER SUBDIWS OF LOT I SKARP AND UNDQUIST ROSE HILL PLAT 1 E ETON KA OAK 1 V I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that i am a duly licensed Professional Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 22703 07112116 Steven V. Ische License No.i Date REVISED 06/21/17 - IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE OREMIER REVISED 07/22/16 - BOUNDARY LAND SURVEYING, LLC PROD. NO.: 1407-00 BOOK 8, PAGE 42 952-443-3010 ITfFIN Im tilc�i :020 MLnTF1N@H0nWLC0M 320-224-7844 set Concrete nail/ IMPERVIOUS SURFACE CC EXISTING HOUSE: 1,' NEW GARAGE/STAIRS/ENTRY: 9 NEW BLACKTOP: 1,l NEW SIDEWALK: 1 NEIGHBORS CONC. DECK: TOTAL IMPERVIOUS: 3,1 LOT AREA (TO OHW) 9, IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE: 39 set concrete nail OF LOT 1 SKARP AND LINDQUIST ROSE HILL PLAT Exhibit C EXISTING FIRST FLOOR SCALE: 1/4" = V-V Exhibfl C �r ITTFIN IM SK, C UOPYRIGHT 2020 M LITIFIN@ HOTMAIL.COM 320-224-7844 9'x7' OVERHEAD GARAGE DOOR ROOM AREA 321-011 18'x7' OVERHEAD GARAGE DOOR KITCHEN AREA NOTE: WINDOWS AND DOORS ARE NOTED IN FEET AND INCHES. FORINSTANCE. WINDOW: DH3050 EQUALS DOUBLE HUNG 3'0"X5'0" FX2020 EQUALS FIXED 2'0"X2'0" DOOR: 2868 EQUALS 2'8" WIDE BY 6'8" TALL 2880 EQUALS 2'8" WIDE BY 8'0" TALL e'-0" A OPEN PATIO CONCRETE PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR SCALE: 1/4" — 1'-0" ADDS 950 SQUARE FEET OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACE Exhibit C NOTE: WINDOWS AND DOORS ARE NOTED IN FEET AND INCHES. FOR INSTANCE: WINDOW. DH3050 EQUALS DOUBLE HUNG 3'0"X5'0" FX2020 EQUALS FIXED 70"X27 DOOR: 2888 EQUALS 78" WIDE BY VW TALL 28W EQUALS 2'8" WIDE BY IM" TALL PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR SCALE: IIC = V-0' SQ SQUARE FEET Exhibit C i� 1 ITTFIN 01 �1(1 HT 2020 MLITTFIN@ HOTMAIL.COM 320-224-7844 EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION EXISTING EAST ELEVATION EXISTING WEST ELEVATION Exhibit C 6/24/2020 From: Scott Qualle [mailto:SQualle@mnspect.com] Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2020 11:39 AM To: Alan Brixius Subject: Property with 5' of lot line Hi Al, Exterior walls are regulated under MN Rule 1309.11302. There are four construction elements that must be considered when constructing a home within five feet of a lot line (fire separation distance). Wall construction, Projections (overhangs), Openings (windows and doors), and Penetrations (pipes and other wall penetrations). The concern with all these elements are that a fire in an adjacent structure jeopardizes the structure being constructed or vice versa. As a result, any new construction must meet the requirements of the code: Assuming that the building in question is NOT sprinklered, the following requirements under MN Rule 1309 table R302.1(1).apply: Walls: If the wall location (measured at a right angle from the building wall) from the lot line is less than five feet, the wall construction must be a 1 hour rated fire -resistance rated wall assembly. Projections: Projections may not extend closer than two feet from the lot line. At two feet (up to, but not including five feet) the projection must be fire protected on the underside with not less than 1 layer of 5/8" type x gypsum board. There may not be any openings for ventilation or penetrations through that protected portion. At or over five feet, no protection is required, including the portion z five feet where other portions of the projection are required to be protected. Openings: If the fire separation distance is less than three feet, no openings are allowed. At three feet, up to, but not including five feet, openings are limited to 25% of the wall area. At five feet, openings are unlimited. Penetrations: Any penetration that penetrates a wall assembly that is required to be rated (under walls above), then all penetrations must be appropriately fire protected under 1309.11302.4. Thanks for your inquiry. Scott Qualle President MNSPECT, LLC. Helping You Comply with the Code 235 First Street West Waconia, MN 55387 Direct 952-800-8701 952-442-7520 x1101 Fax 952-442-7521 Cell 763-458-6926 scott(@mnspect.com www.mnspect.com Exhibit D RESOLUTION NO. 20-17 CITY OF SPRING PARK COUNTY OF HENNEPIN STATE OF MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION ADDRESSING VARIANCES FOR A SIDE YARD SETBACK LOCATED AT 4317 CHANNEL ROAD WITHIN THE CITY OF SPRING PARK WHEREAS, Patrick and Hannah Berry (the "Applicant") have applied for a side yard setback variances for the expansion of their home and garage at their property located at 4317 Channel Road (the "Property") in the City of Spring Park (the "City"); and WHEREAS, The Applicant is seeking a side yard variance to bring the side yard setback of 3.1 feet along their west lot line for the construction of a home addition and attached garage; and WHEREAS, the City ordinance requires that lots in the R-1 district have a setback of 10 feet for side yards; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Spring Park held a public meeting on July 8, 2020 to consider the application materials, the planning report of July 1, 2020, and hear public testimony. Upon closing the public hearing, the Planning Commission recommended the City Council approve the variance for a side yard setback based on the findings and recommendations outlined in the July 1, 2020 planning report ; and WHEREAS, the Spring Park City Council has received the Patrick and Hannah Berry application, the July 1, 2020 planning report, and the Planning Commission recommendation, and agrees with the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission as outlined in the July 1, 2020 planning report. NOW, THEREFORE BE IF RESOLVED, that the City Council of Spring Park, Minnesota hereby approves the requested side yard setback as illustrated in the site plans dated June 2, 2020 and based on the findings outlined in the July 1, 2020 planning reports subject to the following conditions: 1. Construction will not deviate from the site plan submitted to the city on 6/2/2020 as part of the variance application. Any change to the dimensions of the addition would be subject to a separate review. 2. The applicant will have to demonstrate building plans that meet the building inspectors and state requirements for buildings within five feet of a lot line. 3. Given that the amount of impervious surface at the site will exceed 30%, the applicant will need to meet the conditions outlined in Sec. 42-279 (4) b. of the Spring Park zoning code in order to mitigate the stormwater impacts of the addition. • The applicant will submit a separate site grading and drainage plan to ensure proper stormwater management practices. This plan will be subject to review and approval by the city engineer. • Staff recommends the use of a gutter and down spout system on the building eaves to direct runoff away from the adjacent properties and into one of the storm water management options selected from Sec. 42-279 of the Spring Park zoning code. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Spring Park this 20th day of July 2020. ATTEST: Theresa Schyma, City Clerk CITY OF SPRING PARK Jerome Rockvam, Mayor 2 City of Spring Park Staff Payroll 07-15-20 Checks 31906-31930 Check # Employee/Council Name Check Amount Check Date 5659 5660 5661 Farniok, Sharon L. Schyma, Theresa J. Tolsma, Daniel J. $1,476.05 7/15/2020 7/1UNN $2,174.13 $2,780.23 $6,430.41 7/15/2020 _ - Sub Total Chase, Mark Hoffman, Jeff Horton, Pam Hughes, Gary Rockvam, Jerry_ Sub Total $0.00 Electronic Misc. Disbursements EFT#30544 PERA Employee/Employer Payroll Payment for 7/15/20 $1,256.19 7/16/2020 7/16/2020 EFT#30543 FICA Employee/Employer Payroll Withholding Taxes for 7/15/2020 $2,219.13 EFT#030538 Sun Life Ins. Jul.20' Employee Life Ins.Premium $18.00 7/6/2020 EFT#030539 Sun Life Ins. Jul.20' Em to ee LTD Ins. Premium $36.63 7/6/2020 EFT#030540 Heath Partners Jul.20' Em to ee Health Ins. Premium $2,785.72 7/6/2020 _ EFT#30541 Jun. 20' Sales & Use Tax on Utility Bills $34.00 7/13/2020 EFT#30542 MN Dept.of Labor & Industry 2nd Qtr.20' Building Permit Surcharge Fee $197.75 7/15/2020 Sub Total $6,547.42 Claims Ck#031906 - Ck#031930 TOTALS $67,411.26 7/20/2020 $80,389.09 CITY OF SPRING PARK *Check Summary Register@ July 2020 Name Check Date 10100 Wells Fargo Bank NA Paid Chk# 031906 BAKKELUND TREE & LANDSCAP 7/20/2020 Paid Chk# 031907 BIFFS, INC. 7/20/2020 Paid Chk# 031908 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON 7/20/2020 Paid Chk# 031909 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 7/20/2020 Paid Chk# 031910 CORE & MAIN LP 7/20/2020 Paid Chk# 031911 EARL F. ANDERSEN, INC. 7/20/2020 Paid Chk# 031912 ECM PUBLISHERS, INC. 7/20/2020 Paid Chk# 031913 FIVE TECHNOLOGY, INC. 7/20/2020 Paid Chk# 031914 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL 7/20/2020 Paid Chk# 031915 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY 7/20/2020 Paid Chk# 031916 INNOVATIVE OFFICE SOLUTION 7/20/2020 Paid Chk# 031917 JUBILEE FOODS 7/20/2020 Paid Chk# 031918 MEDIACOM, LLC 7/20/2020 Paid Chk# 031919 MNSPECT, LLC 7/20/2020 Paid Chk# 031920 NAVARRE TRUE VALUE HARDW 7/20/2020 Paid Chk# 031921 NORLINGS LAKE MTKA LANDSC 7/20/2020 Paid Chk# 031922 NORTHWEST ASSOC. CONSULT 7/20/2020 Paid Chk# 031923 CITY OF ORONO 7/20/2020 Paid Chk# 031924 REPUBLIC SERVICES, INC 7/20/2020 Paid Chk# 031925 SECURITY & SOUND CO 7/20/2020 Paid Chk# 031926 SPECIALIZED ENVIROMENTAL T 7/20/2020 Paid Chk# 031927 US BANK 7/20/2020 Paid Chk# 031928 VELOCITY TELEPHONE 7/20/2020 Paid Chk# 031929 WIN-911 SOFTWARE 7/20/2020 Paid Chk# 031930 XCEL ENERGY 7/20/2020 Total Checks Check Amt 07/16/20 $6,600.00 Put Up & Take Down Flags for 4 $164.00 Portable Restroom Service at T $21.00 June 20' Water Testing Fees $194.56 Gas Usage for WTP - 05/20/20-6 $1,130.00 Purchased (1) meter and (4) r $116.45 Purchased 48x9 (No Turn Around $38.55 Publish Public Hearing Notice $280.00 Jul.20' Monthly IT Managed Uti $24.30 Jun.20' Locates - 18 ea. $20.00 2020 Annual Special Assessment $10.10 Misc.Office Supply $19.06 Misc. Grocery Supplies - Bottl $226.90 Internet Services - 7/11/20-8/ $771.54 Jun.20' Plan Check Fee $9.50 Shop Supply to fix Water Fount $5,734.91 Jun.20' Landscape Services - J $6,646.85 Jun.20' Planning Services - Va $37,404.00 Jul.20' Contracted Police Sery $1,138.03 Jun. 20' Residential Recycling $324.00 2020 Annual Fee for Monitoring $201.50 Jun.20' yard waste dropped at $2,053.51 MCFOA Annual Membership for Th $223.97 Jul.20' Phone & Long Distance $495.00 2020 Annual Maintenance Fee fo $3,563.53 Electric Usage for Lift#1 - 5/ $67,411.26 CITY OF SPRING PARK *Check Detail Register© July 2020 07/16/20 5:55 PM Page 1 Check Amt Invoice Comment 10100 Wells Fargo Bank NA Paid Chk# 031906 7/20/2020 BAKKELUND TREE & LANDSCAPE SER E 101-43100-316 Tree Maintenance $4,200.00 2910 Services to remove trees/stump chipping/trim/disposal E 101-41940-431 Flags/Banners/Maint/Labor $2,400.00 2912 Put Up & Take Down Flags for 4th of July Holiday on 7/2/20 & 7/7/20 ,tal BAKKELUND TREE & LANDSCAPE SER $6,600.00 Paid Chk# 031907 7/20/2020 BIFFS, INC. E 101-45200-384 Refuse/Garbage Disposal $164.00 W771274 Portable Restroom Service at Thor Thompson Park - 6/17/20 - 7/14/20 Total BIFFS, INC. $164.00 Paid Chk# 031908 7/20/2020 BLOOMINGTON CITY OF E 601-49400-306 Testing Fees $21.00 2000153 June 20' Water Testing Fees Total BLOOMINGTON CITY OF $21.00 Paid Chk# 031909 7/20/2020 CENTERPOINT ENERGY E 101-45200-384 Refuse/Garbage Disposal $17.06 062920A Gas Usage for City Hall - 5/20/20-6/19/20 E 601-49400-381 Utilities/Electric/Gas $79.81 062920E Gas Usage for WTP - 05/20/20-6/19/20 E 602-49450-381 Utilities/Electric/Gas $97.69 062920C Gas Usage for Lift#1-6 - 5/20/20-6/19/20 Total CENTERPOINT ENERGY $194.56 Paid Chk# 031910 7/20/2020 CORE & MAIN LP E 601-49400-201 Meters & Supplies $1,130.00 M616765 Purchased (1) meter and (4) radio readers Total CORE & MAIN LP $1,130.00 Paid Chk# 031911 7/20/2020 EARL F. ANDERSEN, INC. E 101-43100-226 Sign Repair Materials $116.45 0123672-IN Purchased 48x9 (No Turn Around Sign) Total EARL F. ANDERSEN, INC. $116.45 Paid Chk# 031912 7/20/2020 ECM PUBLISHERS, INC. E 101-41600-351 Legal Notices Publishing $38.55 784751 Publish Public Hearing Notice for Candidate Filing Total ECM PUBLISHERS, INC. $38.55 Paid Chk# 031913 7/20/2020 FIVE TECHNOLOGY, INC. E 101-41500-330 IT Technology Support $93.33 10720-17 Jul.20' Monthly IT Managed Utility Service E 601-49400-330 IT Technology Support $93.33 10720-17 Jul.20' Monthly IT Managed Utility Service E 602-49450-330 IT Technology Support $93.34 10720-17 Jul.20' Monthly IT Managed Utility Service Total FIVE TECHNOLOGY, INC. $280.00 Paid Chk# 031914 7/20/2020 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL E 601-49400-310 Contracted Services $12.15 0060746 Jun.20' Locates - 18 ea. E 602-49450-310 Contracted Services $12.15 0060746 Jun.20' Locates - 18 ea. Total GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL $24.30 Paid Chk# 031915 7/20/2020 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY TAX E 101-41500-437 Other Miscellaneous $20.00 0620-17 2020 Annual Special Assessments Fee Total HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY TAX $20.00 CITY OF SPRING PARK *Check Detail Register© July 2020 Check Amt Invoice Paid Chk# 031916 7/20/2020 INNOVATIVE OFFICE SOLUTIONS E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies $3.36 IN3023113 E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies $3.36 IN3023113 E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies $3.38 IN3023113 Total INNOVATIVE OFFICE SOLUTIONS $10.10 Paid Chk# 031917 7/20/2020 JUBILEE FOODS E 101-41500-437 Other Miscellaneous $19.06 070120 Total JUBILEE FOODS $19.06 Paid Chk# 031918 7/20/2020 MEDIACOM, LLC E 101-42000-324 Internet Service $75.64 070120 E 601-49400-324 Internet Service $75.63 070120 E 602-49450-324 Internet Service $75.63 070120 Total MEDIACOM, LLC $226.90 Paid Chk# 031919 7/20/2020 MNSPECT, LLC E 101-42400-305 E 101-42400-310 Plan Check Fees Contracted Services Total MNSPECT, LLC $126.91 8381A $644.63 8381E $771.54 Paid Chk# 031920 7/20/2020 NAVARRE TRUE VALUE HARDWARE n E 101-45200-404 Repairs/Existing Equip $5.71 325007 E 101-41900-215 Shop Supplies $3.79 325237 Total NAVARRE TRUE VALUE HARDWARE $9.50 Paid Chk# 031921 7/20/2020 NORLINGS LAKE MTKA LANDSCP INC E 101-41940-432 Landscaping/Gardens/Maint $5,734.91 37194 otal NORLINGS LAKE MTKA LANDSCP INC $5,734.91 Paid Chk# 031922 7/20/2020 NORTHWEST ASSOC CONSULT (NAC) E 101-41910-310 Contracted Services $729.80 24844-1 G 101-21700 Escrow Account $747.60 24844-2 G 101-21700 Escrow Account $828.80 24844-3 G 101-21700 Escrow Account $835.40 24844-4 E 101-41910-310 Contracted Services $2,966.25 24844-5A G 101-21700 Escrow Account $89.00 24844-56 E 101-41910-310 Contracted Services $450.00 24845 otal NORTHWEST ASSOC CONSULT (NAC) $6,646.85 Paid Chk# 031923 7/20/2020 ORONO CITY OF E 101-42000-310 Contracted Services $37,404.00 20141611 Total ORONO CITY OF $37,404.00 Comment Misc.Office Supply Misc.Office Supply Misc.Office Supply 07/16/20 5:55 PM Page 2 Misc. Grocery Supplies - Bottled Water/Napkins/Soft Soap Internet Services - 7/11/20-8/10/20 Internet Services - 7/11/20-8/10/20 Internet Services - 7/11/20-8/10/20 Jun.20' Plan Check Fee Jun.20' Residential/Commercial Inspection & Permit Fees Shop Supply to fix Water Fountain at Tennis Court Shop Supply Jun.20' Landscape Services - Job#M397 Jun.20' Planning Services - Rental Housing Ordinance - (4.10 hrs.) Jun.20' Planning Services - Garage Variance for 2463 Black Lake Road - (4.20 hrs.) Jun,20' Planning Services - Sideyard Variance at 4317 Channel Road for Patrick & Hannah - (8.70 hrs. Jun.20' Planning Services - Variance at 4364/4368 West Arm Road for Barb & Andrew Ward - (9.40 hrs.) Jun.20' Planning Services - General - (16.50 hrs.) Jun.20' Planning Services - Garage Variance for 2463 Black Lake Road - (.50 hrs.) Jun.20' Planning Services - Meetings - (8.60 hrs.) Jul.20' Contracted Police Services CITY OF SPRING PARK 07/16/20 5:55 PM Page 3 *Check Detail Register© July 2020 Check Amt Invoice Comment Paid Chk# 031924 7/20/2020 REPUBLIC SERVICES, INC. E 101-42900-310 Contracted Services $1,138.03 0894-0052028 Jun. 20' Residential Recycling Services - 6/1/20-6/30/20 Total REPUBLIC SERVICES, INC. $1,138.03 Paid Chk# 031925 7/20/2020 SECURITY & SOUND CO E 101-41900-310 Contracted Services $324.00 22632 2020 Annual Fee for Monitoring Security & Fire System Total SECURITY & SOUND CO $324.00 Paid Chk# 031926 7/20/2020 SPECIALIZED ENV IRO.TECHNO.INC. E 101-42800-310 Contracted Services $201.50 063020 Total SPECIALIZED ENVIRO.TECHNO.INC. $201.50 Paid Chk# 031927 7/20/2020 US BANK Jun.20' yard waste dropped at Mulch Store E 101-41500-433 Membership/Dues/Edu $46.00 060920 MCFOA Annual Membership for Theresa Schyma E 101-45200-310 Contracted Services $996.15 062320 Purchased Picnic Table for Wilkes Park from The Park E 101-41100-437 Other Miscellaneous E 101-45200-404 Repairs/Existing Equip E 101-41500-433 Membership/Dues/Edu E 101-41500-330 IT Technology Support E 101-41500-299 Admin Expenses E 601-49400-400 Repairs/Maint General Total US BANK Paid Chk# 031928 7/20/2020 VELOCITY TELEPHONE E 101-42000-321 Telephone and Mtce Agreement E 601-49400-321 Telephone and Mtce Agreement E 602-49450-321 Telephone and Mtce Agreement Total VELOCITY TELEPHONE Paid Chk# 031929 7/20/2020 WIN-911 SOFTWARE E 601-49400-330 IT Technology Support E 602-49450-330 IT Technology Support Paid Chk# 031930 E 101-43100-381 E 101-43100-381 E 101-43100-381 E 602-49450-381 E 601-49400-381 E 101-43100-381 E 602-49450-381 E 602-49450-381 E 101-43100-381 Total WIN-911 SOFTWARE 7/20/2020 XCEL ENERGY Utilities/Electric/Gas Utilities/Electric/Gas Utilities/Electric/Gas Utilities/Electric/Gas Utilities/Electric/Gas Utilities/Electric/Gas Utilities/Electric/Gas Utilities/Electric/Gas Utilities/Electric/Gas Catalog $47.57 062520 Subway for Special Meeting on West Arm West $32.99 063020 Purchased new basketball hoop at Thor Thompson Park ($275.00) 070620B Refund from Canceled MCFOA Annual Conference $83.00 1258847553-5 Jul.20' GoToMyPC Pro Fee $75.24 29160354 Jul.20' Zoom Fee $1,047.56 399985 Purchased (3) air strippers for WTP $2,053.51 $74.65 13580771-n $74.65 13580771-n $74.67 13580771-n $223.97 $247.50 20200916 $247.50 20200916 $495.00 ($17.18) 070720 ($14.23) 070720 $268.51 0848896731 $140.58 0848897432 $1,616.83 0848897592 $129.13 0848898246 $57.51 0848898825 $79.51 0848899110 $52.67 0848899204 E 602-49450-381 Utilities/Electric/Gas $22.23 0848899665 Jul.20' Phone & Long Distance Service - 7/21/20-8/21/20 Jul.20' Phone & Long Distance Service - 7/21/20-8/21/20 Jul.20' Phone & Long Distance Service - 7/21/20-8/21/20 2020 Annual Maintenance Fee for WTP & Lift Stations 911 call outs 2020 Annual Maintenance Fee for WTP & Lift Stations 911 call outs Electric Combo Refund Credit Electric Combo Refund Credit Electric Usage for City Hall - 05/26/20-06/24/20 Electric Usage for Lift#2 - 05/26/20-06/24/20 Electric Usage for WTP - 05/27/20-06/24/20 Electric Usage for Central & North Street Lights Electric Usage for Lift#5 - 05/26/20-06/24/20 Electric Usage for Lift#3 - 05/26/20-06/24/20 Electric Usage for Traffic Signal at 4300 Shoreline Drive - 05/26/20-06/24/20 Electric Usage for Lift#4 - 05/26/20-06/24/20 CITY OF SPRING PARK *Check Detail Register© E 101-43100-381 Utilities/Electric/Gas E 602-49450-491 LS Repair/Maint E 602-49450-381 Utilities/Electric/Gas E 101-43100-381 Utilities/Electric/Gas Total XCEL ENERGY July 2020 07/16/20 5:55 PM Page 4 Check Amt Invoice Comment Jim —19 _.._.� $502.80 0848900124 Electric Usage for Co -Owned Street Lights - 05/27/20- 06/23/20 $88.29 0848900136 Electric Usage for Lift#1 - 5/26/20-6/24/20 $528.13 0848900404 Electric Usage for Lift#6 - 05/26/20-06/24/20 $108.75 0848900499 Electric Usage for Traffic Signal & East Street Lights - 05/26/20-06/24/20 $3,563.53 10100 Wells Fargo Bank NA Fund Summary $67,411.26 10100 Wells Fargo Bank NA 101 GENERAL FUND $61,488.83 601 WATER FUND $4,401.82 602 SEWER FUND $1,520.61 $67,411.26 RECEIVED JUL 13 2020 2020 MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT MONTH: June Emergency Response and Firefighter Hours Detail 2020 2019 Month Firefighter YTD YTD Month Firefighter YTD YTD City Call Type Calls Hours Calls Hours Calls Hours Calls Hours MOUND Fire Rescue Duty Officer 11 16 0 234 350 0 48 1361 9 27 2 144 398 3 42 102 7 843 1602 8 84 1660 9 10 MINNETRISTA Fire Rescue Duty Officer 6 7 0 114 136 0 24 532 5 5 0 68 117 0 12 26 3 177 524 3 29 554 3 3 SHOREWOOD Fire Rescue Duty Officer 0 1 0 0 18 0 2 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 0 0 SPRING PARK Fire Rescue Duty Offier 2 6 1 30 93 1 21 442 2 9 1 37 131 1 12 47 4 217 744 4 36 666 1 1 MUTUAL AID Fire Rescue 3 2 70 36 11 352 2 0 27 0 20 0 733 0 3 58 Weather, Special STAND BY Event, Etc. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Activity All Cities Fire 22 448 106 2715 18 276 86 1,970 Rescue 32 633 154 2967 41 646 175 2870 Duty Officer 1 1 13 14 3 4 14 15 Stand By 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 55 1082 273 5696 62 926 1 275 4855 Monthly Activity by Call Category 2020 2019 COMMERCIAL 3 4 RESIDENTIAL 39 49 OTHER (OUTSIDE/ROADWAY/LAKE/OPEN AREA/MISC) 13 9 SERVICE CALLS (Smoke/CO Detectors) 1 0 LEGITIMATE FIRE ALARMS 5 2 FALSE FIRE ALARMS 1 0 3 MUTUAL AID AND TRAINING/DRILL SUMMARY 2020 2019 Category Month YTD Month YTD MUTUAL AID CALLS RECEIVED 0 3 0 1 MUTUAL AID CALLS GIVEN 5 14 2 20 TRAINING/DRILL HOURS 366.5 2022 1 392.5 2402 JAadmin\REPORTS - Fire Incident & Performance\2020 Performance Reports\2020 City's Monthly Report RECEIVED JUL 131020 Mound Fire Department Incident Reports - Spring Park June, 2020 FIRE NO. DATE CITY ADDRESS FIRE/ , RESCUE DESCRIPTION FF ACTION TAKEN HOURS 231 6/10/2020 Spring Park 4372 West Arm Road Fire Haz Cond - Wires Down Secured Area - Contacted Xcel 15 258 6/20/2020 Spring Park Sunset Drive & Shoreline Drive f Fire Fire - Motorcycle I Fire Extinguished upon Arrival 15 Total Fire Calls 2 1 Total Fire Hours 30 230 6/9/2020 Spring Park 2450 Island Drive Rescue EMS Transported 13 233 6/11/2020 Spring Park 4695 Shoreline Drive Rescue EMS Unknown Transport 16 236 6/12/2020 Spring Park 4501 Shoreline Blvd, #16 Rescue EMS Assist 14 249 6/17/2020 Spring Park 4501 Shoreline Drive, #239 Rescue EMS Unknown Transport 25 265 6/25/2020 Spring Park 4523 Shoreline Drive, #309 Rescue EMS Unknown Transport 11 270 1 6/27/2020 Spring Park 4516 West Arm Road Rescue EMS Private Transport 14 Total Rescue Calls 6 Total Rescue Hours 93 1 257 1 6/20/2020 1 Spring Park 1 4501 Shoreline Drive I Rescue I EMS I Assist 1 1 er cer hours TOTAL FIRE, RESCUE & DUTY OFFICER CALLS 9 1 TOTAL FIRE, RESCUE & DUTY OFFICER HOURS 124 Mound Fire Department RECEIVED JUL 13 1020 City of Spring Park January -June, 2020 Fire Alarm / False Alarm Report Fire No Date Address Alarm TY e Activity or Action Taken False Alarm Pre - ventable Fire Smoke CO 6 13 18 26 29 39 67 68 84 133 169 205 213 1/13/2020 1/18/2020 1/22/2020 1/26/2020 1/28/2019 2/4/2020 2/22/2020 2/23/2020 3/3/2020 4/3/2020 4/26/2020 5/27/2020 5/28/2020 4599 Shoreline Drive, #205 4601 Shoreline Drive 4250 West Arm Road 4599 Shoreline Drive 4250 West Arm Road 4250 West Arm Road 3746 Sunset Dr 3746 Sunset Dr 4559 Shoreline Drive 4601 Shoreline Drive, #106 4559 Shoreline Drive 3818 Sunset Drive 4599 Shoreline Dr, #204 x x x x x x x x x x x x x Burnt Food Set off b cooking Set off by contractor Child Pulled Pull Station Set off by contractor Cancelled enroute Water Issue Set off by construction Burnt Food, ventilated Ventilated Set off by haze - unknown origin Set off by Area Power Outa e Burnt Food N N Y Y Y N Y N N N N N Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y N N Y 2020 YTD TOTALS FIRE ALARM 13 False Alarms 5 SMOKE DETECTOR 0 Legitimate Alarms 8 CO DETECTOR 0 Preventable 10 TOTAL - ALL ALARMS 13 J:\admin\REPORTS - Fire Incident & Performance\2020 Performance Reports\2020 Fire Alarm - False Alarm Reports by City