Loading...
1/17/2017 - City Council - Regular - Agendas* The Consent Agenda lists those items of business which are considered to be routine, recommended for approval, and/or which need no discussion. The several separate items listed on the Consent Agenda are acted upon by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member makes a request, in which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed elsewhere on the regular agenda for Council discussion and action. ** Under Public Forum individuals may address the City Council about any item not contained on the regular agenda. Each speaker should keep their statements to three minutes to allow sufficient time for others. The Council will take no official action on items discussed at the forum, with the exception of referral to staff for future report. CITY OF SPRING PARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JANUARY 17, 2017 – 7:00 PM SPRING PARK CITY HALL 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ADOPT AGENDA 4. ADOPT CONSENT AGENDA* a. Regular City Council Meeting Minutes from January 3, 2017 b. Set Open Book Meeting Date for Wednesday, April 19, 2017 6:00 – 7:30 PM 5. PUBLIC FORUM ** 6. PRESENTATIONS & GUEST SPEAKERS 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS 8. PETITIONS, REQUESTS, & APPLICATIONS 9. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS a. Resolution 17-05: Municipal Recycling Grant b. Resolution 17-06: WeCAN Resolution of Support 10. REPORTS OF OFFICERS AND COMMITTEES a. Mayor & Council b. City Staff c. Contract Staff 11. NEW BUSINESS & COMMUNICATIONS 12. CLAIMS FOR PAYMENT a. Purchase Order 17-01: Server Upgrade 13. UPCOMING MEETINGS & TRAINING a. January 25 – LMCD – 6:00 PM b. February 6 – City Council – 7:00 PM c. February 8 – LMCD – 7:00 PM d. February 8 – Planning Commission 7:00 PM 14. MISCELLANEOUS (INFORMATION ONLY) a. MFD Press Release b. MFD December Report 15. ADJOURNMENT CITY OF SPRING PARK CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JANUARY 3, 2017 – 7:30 PM SPRING PARK CITY HALL 1. CALL TO ORDER - The meeting was called to order by Mayor Rockvam at 7:30 p.m. 2. OATHS OF OFFICE a. Jerry Rockvam, Mayor / Catherine Kane Palen, Council / Megan Pavot, Council City Clerk Schyma administered the oaths of office to Mayor Rockvam, Council Member Palen, and Council Member Pavot. 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Mayor Rockvam led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. 4. ROLL CALL Council Members Jerome P. Rockvam, Mayor; Pamela Horton; Gary Hughes; Catherine Kane Present: Palen; and Megan Pavot. Staff Present: Dan Tolsma, City Administrator; Nancy Beck, City Attorney; and Theresa Schyma, City Clerk. 5. ADOPT AGENDA M/Hughes, S/Horton to adopt the agenda. Motion carried 5-0. 6. ADOPT CONSENT AGENDA a. Regular City Council Meeting Minutes from December 19, 2016 M/Horton, S/Pavot to approve the Consent Agenda. Motion carried 5-0. 7. PUBLIC FORUM - None. 8. PRESENTATIONS & GUEST SPEAKERS - None. 9. PUBLIC HEARINGS - None. 10. PETITIONS, REQUESTS, & APPLICATIONS - None. 11. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS a. Resolution 17-01: Naming Official Depositories M/Hughes, S/Horton that the following resolution be adopted and that it be made part of these minutes: RESOLUTION NO. 17-01 RESOLUTION NAMING OFFICIAL DEPOSITORY Motion carried 5-0. This resolution appears as Resolution No. 17-01. b. Resolution 17-02: Establishing Order of Business M/Pavot, S/Hughes that the following resolution be adopted and that it be made part of these minutes: RESOLUTION NO. 17-02 RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING ORDER OF BUSINESS Motion carried 5-0. This resolution appears as Resolution No. 17-02. c. Resolution 17-03: Appointments Mayor Rockvam asked if the entire Council was agreeable to the proposed appointments. The City Council consensus was that the appointments were acceptable. M/Hughes, S/Palen that the following resolution be adopted and that it be made part of these minutes: RESOLUTION NO. 17-03 RESOLUTION FOR APPOINTMENTS Motion carried 5-0. This resolution appears as Resolution No. 17-03. d. Resolution 17-04: Dates of Meetings, Holidays, & Business Hours – Mayor Rockvam presented a summary report of the changes to meeting times and dates for 2017. The city council consensus was to change the start time of regular City Council meetings to 7:00 p.m. and to change the date and time of the monthly work session to the third Monday at 6:00 p.m. M/Horton, S/Pavot that the following resolution be adopted and that it be made part of these minutes: RESOLUTION NO. 17-04 RESOLUTION SETTING DATES OF MEETINGS, HOLIDAYS & OFFICE HOURS IN 2017 Motion carried 5-0. This resolution appears as Resolution No. 17-04. 12. REPORTS OF OFFICERS AND COMMITTEES a. Mayor & Council – Mayor Rockvam asked the Council to give more direction to City staff and to utilize them more than in the past since they are fully competent. Council Member Hughes provided an update from the most recent Lake Minnetonka Conservation District (LMCD) meeting. Council Member Palen asked about updating the City’s communications network. Mayor Rockvam agreed an update is necessary and asked for a progress report at the next meeting. City Administrator Tolsma responded that the research has been completed and staff will provide an update at the next Council meeting. Council Member Hughes asked for a project update regarding the audio/visual upgrade in the Council Chambers and on the security upgrade in City Hall. City Administrator Tolsma responded that the Council Chambers upgrade is scheduled for installation next week. The research for the City Hall security upgrade is generally done and staff will begin reaching out to vendors. The security upgrade was put on hold during the election but could see completion by the end of February. b. City Staff – City Administrator Tolsma discussed the City’s snow removal services due to the recent snow and ice events. c. City Planner – None. d. City Engineer i. Agreement for Comprehensive Plan Services – City Administrator Tolsma discussed the proposed agreement for engineering services relating to updating the Comprehensive Plan. Mayor Rockvam asked if the estimate for engineering services was realistic. City Administrator Tolsma responded yes; Spring Park is fully developed and should not see significant changes when updating the Comprehensive Plan. Mayor Rockvam stated that he would like to see a future work session topic added to discuss how the City budgets for updating the Comprehensive Plan. M/Hughes, S/Palen to approve the agreement for professional engineering services regarding the Comprehensive Plan Update. Motion carried 5-0. e. City Attorney – None. 13. NEW BUSINESS & COMMUNICATIONS - None. 14. CLAIMS FOR PAYMENT M/Horton, S/Hughes to approve the bills & payroll. Motion carried 5-0. 15. UPCOMING MEETINGS & TRAINING a. January 10 – Administration Committee – 12:00 PM b. January 11 – LMCD – 7:00 PM c. January 11 – Planning Commission – 7:00 PM d. January 17 – City Council – 7:00 PM 16. MISCELLANEOUS (INFORMATION ONLY) a. MFD Press Release 17. ADJOURNMENT M/Hughes, S/Horton to adjourn the City Council Meeting at 7:51 p.m. Motion carried 5-0. Date Approved: January 17, 2017 _________________________ Theresa Schyma, City Clerk ____________________________ Dan Tolsma, City Administrator To: Theresa Schyma, City Clerk From: Nancy Wojcik, Assistant County Assessor Kim Jensen, Administrative Senior Appraiser Date: Re: 2017 Open Book Meeting Dates ____ Wednesday _________________ __ April 19, 2017 _______ Day of the Week Date Your city has opted for an Open Book meeting in place of a Local Board of Appeal and Equalization meeting. After reviewing previous meeting dates, the date noted above has been selected for the 2017 appeal process. Please confirm the date as noted, or if you wish to change the date, call us with an alternative by January 25th. In addition to the date, please complete the form with the name of the Mayor and Council Members. This will allow for Notices of Valuation and Classification to be prepared timely. If you have any questions, please feel free to call Kim Jensen at (612) 348-6106. Please return the confirmation to Kim Jensen, A-2103 Government Center, Minneapolis, MN, 55487, or email to AO.Admin@hennepin.us. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CONFIRMATION City: Mayor Date: Council Time: Council Place: Council Council Council Clerk/Administrator Signature Date ________________ STAFF MEMO RESOLUTION TO APPROVE 2017-2020 RESIDENTIAL RECYCLING GRANT AGREEMENT 1. BACKGROUND: Hennepin County receives annual funding from the State of Minnesota for recycling collection programs. The county then proportionally distributes these funds to cities that meet the terms of the recycling grant agreement. Spring Park’s most recent residential recycling grant agreement with the county expired at the end of 2016. The City Council is considering the attached resolution, grant agreement, and funding policy to ensure the City continues to receive funds to help offset the costs associated with administering the City’s recycling program. 2. DISCUSSION: The Hennepin County Board of Commissioners is recognizing that organics recycling is the greatest opportunity to reduce residential trash. The new funding policy will continue to fund city recycling programs, but will gradually shift more funds to cities to support organics recycling. Organics recycling is not yet an option for residential properties in Spring Park. The City’s current recycling contractor, Republic Services, as well as all other licensed residential garbage haulers in the City do not yet offer organics recycling. Rich Hirstein, Ma nager of Municipal Recycling and Waste Services for Republic Services, stated at the November 28, 2016 Council Work Session, that before residential organics recycling can be implemented in this geographical area there will need to be more collection centers. City staff will keep residents informed once there are viable options for residential organics recycling in Spring Park. The terms of this agreement are similar to past agreements and have been reviewed by the City Attorney. 3. FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS: The projected recycling grant funds for Spring Park are listed below. These numbers are subject to change based on state funding and the number of households in the city. Year Projected Recycling Grant Funds 2017 $2,760 2018 $2,415 2019 $2,070 2020 $1,725 4. RECOMMENDATION: Approve a resolution authorizing the Hennepin County Grant Agreement to help fund the City’s residential recycling program. CITY OF SPRING PARK SPRING PARK, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 17-05 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING MUNICIPAL RECYCLING GRANT AGREEMENT WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statute 115A.552, Counties shall ensure that residents have an opportunity to recycle; and WHEREAS, Hennepin County Ordinance 13 requires each City to implement a recycling program to enable the County to meet its recycling goals; and WHEREAS, the County has adopted a Hennepin County Residential Recycling Funding Policy to distribute funds to cities for the development and implementation of a recycling program; and WHEREAS, to be eligible to receive these County funds, cities must meet the conditions set forth in the funding policy and the agreement; and WHEREAS, the City wishes to receive these municipal recycling grant funds; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Spring Park City Council authorizes and directs the Mayor, City Administrator and city staff to execute a Residential Recycling Grant Agreement with Hennepin County for the years 2017 through 2020. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that as a condition to receive grant funds under the Hennepin County funding policy, the City agrees to implement a recycling program as committed to by its submission of the 2017 Hennepin County Residential Recycling Grant Application and the City will use such County funds for the limited purpose of implementing the City’s waste reduction and recycling program. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Spring Park this 17th day of January 2017. Approved: ________________________________ Jerome P. Rockvam, Mayor Attest: __________________________________ Theresa Schyma, City Clerk Hennepin County Residential Recycling Funding Policy January 1, 2017 – December 31, 2020 Board Adopted: November 29, 2016 1 I. Policy Description A. Background The Hennepin County Board of Commissioners has determined that curbside collection of recyclables and organics from Hennepin County residents is an effective strategy to reduce reliance on landfills, prevent pollution, conserve natural resources and energy, improve public health, support the economy, and reduce greenhouse gases. Therefore, the county adopted the goals established in State Statute and by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) in its Metropolitan Solid Waste Management Policy Plan and developed a Residential Recycling Funding Policy to help reach a 75% recycling rate by 2030. The county will distribute all Select Committee on Recycling and the Environment (SCORE) funds received from the state to cities for curbside collection of residential recyclables and organics. If cities form a joint powers organization responsible for managing a comprehensive recycling and waste education system for the residents of those cities, the county will distribute recycling and organics grants to that organization. Cities are expected to fulfill the conditions of the policy. B. Term of the Policy Hennepin County is committed to implement this policy and continue distributing all SCORE funds received from the state for the purpose of funding curbside residential recycling and organics programs from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2020. The county may revise this policy if it determines changes are needed to assure compliance with state law and MPCA goals established for metropolitan counties. In the event that SCORE funds are eliminated from the state budget or significantly reduced, the county will consult with municipalities at that time and develop a subsequent recommendation to the board on continuation of this policy and future funding of curbside recycling and organics programs. C. Grant Agreements Each municipality seeking funding under the terms of the Residential Recycling Funding Policy must enter into a recycling grant agreement with the county for a term concurrent with the expiration of this policy, December 31, 2020. The grant agreement must be accompanied by a resolution authorizing the city to enter into such an agreement. D. Fund Distribution The county will distribute to Hennepin County municipalities 100% of SCORE funds that the county receives from the state. SCORE funds will be dedicated to two different purposes: 1) 2 curbside recycling and 2) curbside organics recycling. SCORE funds are based on revenue received by the State of Minnesota from the solid waste management (SWM) tax on garbage services. SCORE funds are subject to change based on the SWM tax revenue received by the state and funds allocated by the legislature. Funds distributed to municipalities for the current calendar year will be based on SCORE funds received by the county in the state’s corresponding fiscal year. II. Recycling A. Allocation of Funds The following formula will be utilized to determine a city’s recycling SCORE grant each year. Percent of SCORE funds allocated to curbside recycling: 2017 80% 2018 70% 2019 60% 2020 50% City recycling grant calculation: Number of households with curbside recycling in city ------------------------------- Total number of households with curbside recycling in county x Total SCORE Funds available for recycling = Recycling grant amount available to the city Eligible residential households are defined as single family through eight-plex residential buildings or other residential buildings where each housing unit sets out its own recycling container for curbside collection. The number of eligible households will be determined by counting the number of eligible households on January 1 of each funding year. The city will report the number in its application for funding. B. Application for Funding Each municipality must complete an annual grant application by February 15 to receive funding for that year. The application consists of a web-based report and a planning document provided by the county. The web-based report asks for contract, program, tonnage, and financial 3 information. The participation rate for the curbside recycling program must also be included in the web-based report. The municipality must calculate its participation rate during the month of October. The methodology for measuring participation must be provided to the county upon request. The planning document asks for a description of activities the city will implement to increase recycling and make progress toward county objectives. C. Use of Funds The following requirements apply to the use of recycling funds: 1. All grant funds accepted from the county must be used for waste reduction and recycling capital and operating expenses in the year granted. The county will not reimburse any funds in excess of actual expenses. 2. A municipality or joint powers organization may not charge its residents through property tax, utility fees, or any other method for the portion of its recycling program costs that are funded by county grant funds. 3. Municipalities must establish a separate accounting mechanism, such as a project number, activity number, or fund that will separate recycling revenues and expenditures from other municipal activities, including solid waste and yard waste activities. 4. Recycling and waste reduction activities, revenues, and expenditures are subject to audit. 5. Municipalities that do not contract for curbside recycling services will receive grant funds provided that at least 90% of the grant funds are credited back to residents and the city meets all minimum program requirements. The additional 10% may be used for municipal administrative and promotional expenses. D. City Requirements 1. Materials Accepted At a minimum, the following materials must be collected curbside: • Metal food and beverage cans; • Glass food and beverage containers; • Cardboard boxes; • Newspaper and inserts; • Mail, office and school papers; 4 • Cereal, cracker, pasta, cake mix, shoe, gift, and electronics boxes; • Boxes from toothpaste, medications and other toiletries; • Magazines and catalogs; • Aseptic and gable-topped containers; and • Plastic bottles and containers, #1 – Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET, PETE), #2 High Density Polyethylene (HDPE), #4 – Low Density Polyethylene (LDPE) and #5 – Polypropylene (PP) plastic bottles, except those that previously contained hazardous materials or motor oil. The county may add materials to this list and require municipalities to begin collection within one year of receiving notification from the county. Municipalities will notify the county if materials not found on this list will be collected. 2. Education and Outreach The partnership between the county and municipalities has been highly effective in educating residents and motivating behavior change. In order to continue this partnership and increase these efforts, program activities of municipalities must be coordinated with county and regional efforts. Municipalities must adhere to the following requirements: a. Use county terminology when describing recycling guidelines, including the description of materials accepted and not accepted, preparation guidelines, and promotional materials; b. Use images provided by the county or the Solid Waste Management Coordinating Board (SWMCB) if using images of recyclables; c. Provide recycling information on the city’s website, including materials accepted and not accepted, a recycling calendar, and links to county resources; d. Mail a recycling guide to residents each year using a template developed jointly with the county. The county will design and print the guide. If a municipality does not use the template produced by the county, the municipality may develop its own guide at the municipality’s expense, but it must be approved by the county. If the municipality relies on the hauler to provide the recycling guide, this guide requires approval by the county. e. Complete two educational activities from a menu of options developed by the county. 5 Any print material that communicates residential recycling guidelines that were not provided by the county template will require county approval. This does not apply to waste reduction and reuse, articles on recycling that do not include guidelines, or social media posts. The county will respond within five business days to any communication piece submitted. 3. Recycling Performance On an annual basis, municipal recycling programs must demonstrate that a reasonable effort has been made to maintain and increase the pounds of recyclables per household collected from their residential recycling programs. If a municipality does not demonstrate measureable progress, a recycling improvement plan must be submitted by the municipality within 90 days of being notified by the county. The recycling improvement plan must be negotiated with the county and specify the efforts that will be undertaken by the municipality to improve its recycling program to yield the results necessary to achieve county objectives. In cooperation with the county, the municipality may be required to participate in waste and recycling sorts to identify recovery levels of various recyclables in its community. Based on the results of the study, the county and municipality will collaborate to increase the recovery of select recyclable materials being discarded in significant quantities. E. Grant Payments The county will make two equal payments to the municipality. One payment will be made after the county receives the application, which consists of the web-based report and the planning document. A second payment will be made after basic program requirements, education and outreach requirements, and recycling performance have been confirmed and approved. If the municipality meets the county requirements, both payments will be made during the same calendar year. Funding will be withheld until the municipality meets the requirements of this policy. III. Organics Recycling A. Allocation of Funds The following formula will be utilized to determine a city’s organics recycling SCORE grant each year: 6 Percent of SCORE funds allocated to curbside organics recycling: 2017 20% 2018 30% 2019 40% 2020 50% City organics recycling grant calculation: Number of households with curbside organics in city --------------------------------- Total number of households with curbside organics in county x Total SCORE funds available for organics = Organics grant amount available to the city If the formula above results in cities receiving grants where the dollar amount per participating household is greater than $25 per year, then a cap will apply. The funding cap per participating household is $25 per year. The most the county will grant a city is $25 per participating household per year. If funds are left over because of the cap, those funds will carry over into the following year’s SCORE funds. Eligible residential households are defined as single family through eight-plex residential buildings or other residential buildings where the household is signed up for organics service and the household sets out its own container with organics for curbside collection. The number of eligible households will be determined by counting the number of eligible households on September 1 of each funding year. The city will report the number in the application for funding. B. Application for Funds Each municipality must complete an annual application provided by the county by September 1 to receive funding. As a part of the application, a city must submit the number of households signed up for and receiving curbside organics service. C. Use of Funds The grant funds may be used for program expenses, including the following: • Discount to new customers • Discount to existing customers • Referral incentives • City contract costs 7 • Education and outreach • Compostable bags • Kitchen containers • Carts Program administration is not an eligible expense. Yard waste expenses are not eligible. If organics are co-collected with other waste, the organics expenses must be tracked separately. If a city passes funds through to a hauler, 100% of those funds must be credited to residents’ bills. In addition, the following requirements apply: • All grant funds must be used during the term of the agreement. Funds not spent must be returned to the county. • Funds must be expended on eligible activities per Minnesota State Statute 115A.557. • A municipality or joint powers organization may not charge its residents through property tax, utility fees, or any other method for the portion of its organics program costs that are funded by county grant funds. • Municipalities must account for organics expenditures separately upon request by the county. Expenditures are subject to audit. D. Education and Outreach Requirements The partnership between the county and municipalities has been highly effective in educating residents and motivating behavior change. In order to continue this partnership and increase these efforts, program activities of municipalities must be coordinated with county and regional efforts. The following requirements apply: 1. Use county terminology when describing organics recycling guidelines, including the description of materials accepted and not accepted, preparation guidelines, and promotional materials; 2. Use images provided by the county or the SWMCB if using images of organic materials; 3. Provide organics recycling information on the city’s website, including material accepted and not accepted, service options, and links to county resources; 4. Work with the county to develop promotional resources to increase participation. 8 E. Reporting A report on the city’s organics program must be submitted electronically to the county by February 15 following each year. The report must include, but is not limited to, the following: Basic Program Information • Hauler(s) • Collection method • Where organics were delivered to and processed • Is service opt-in or opt-out • Cost of service to residents; contract cost for city • How the service was billed • Items included in service, such as curbside collection, cart, compostable bags, etc. Results • Tons • Number of households signed up • Average pounds per household per year • Participation (set-out rate on pickup day) • Program costs • How funds were used F. Grant Payment The county will make one organics grant payment to a municipality each year. The payment will be made after the county receives the application and confirms that the municipality meets the requirements of this policy. CITY OF SPRING PARK SPRING PARK, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 17-06 RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING CONTINUATION OF CDBG FUNDING OF WESTERN COMMUNITIES ACTION NETWORK (WeCAN) WHEREAS, the City of Spring Park has supported services for its residents given by WeCAN, a community-based human service organization dedicated to helping low-income people achieve greater self-sufficiency and family stability; and WHEREAS, these services include emergency assistance for housing stability, family support services, Meals on Wheels, job seeking support and public assistance intake services and other resources; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Spring Park recommends to the Consolidated Pool Selection Committee that Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding of Western Communities Action Network be continued. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Spring Park this 17th day of January, 2017. Approved: __________________________________ Jerome P. Rockvam, Mayor Attest: _________________________________ Theresa Schyma, City Clerk 4349 WARREN AVENUE, SPRING PARK, MINNESOTA 55384-9711 (952) 471-9051 FAX (952) 471-9160 WWW.CI.SPRING-PARK.MN.US PURCHASE ORDER REQUEST PO # ___________ 1 $ 2 $ 3 $ 4 $ 5 $ 6 $ 7 $ 8 $ Total Project Estimate $ Council Authorization Received: Yes ___ No ___ Date of Council Meeting _________________ Date: _______________________________ Staff Completing Request: ___________________________________________________________ Department: ______________________________________________________________________ Project: __________________________________________________________________________ Justification for purchase(s): No. Item / Service Vendor Estimated Cost FIVE TECHNOLOGY GENERAL SUMMARY DESCRIBING SCOPE OF SERVICES 1) We will install a new updated Firewall/Backup/FileShare/Router solution. It is a new Dell “Utility” Server that will handle all “utility” tasks;  Create and maintain your network (not wifi, but wired network and assign IP addresses, etc - aka Router)  Protect you from the outside threats on the internet (security and monitoring - aka Firewall)  Act as a File Server (gives you additional space for network file shares and backup drive)  Backup your New Windows Server / File Shares locally (in your office) daily as well as move those backups offsite to our servers - for disaster recovery (fire, flood, tornado, theft, etc)  Allow us secure access to your network for remote troubleshooting and monitoring of both servers for issues (Pro-active Support)  Additionally it can be used for many other purposes and grow with your needs over time.  NOTE: The firewall / Utility Server solution that you have in place is dated. The support for the Unix based operating system it relies on is no longer receiving major software patches/updates or security fixes. This means that as vulnerabilities are discovered in a VERY active hacking world you are leaving yourself and the City’s data open to potential threats. (think the security breeches that are making headlines regularly right now and for the last few years) The hardware is also beyond it’s typical/recommended lifespan and no longer in warranty. 2) We will be installing a new Windows Server.  Latest Windows Server operating system  Major security and feature updates  Much faster and improved hardware reliability  Significant improvement in Storage Space, RAM and Processors (Hardware Specs - a lot has changed in last few years)  Hard Drive and Power Supply Redundancy (less prone to failure/downtime - in the event of a Power Supply failure will keep running and switch over to alternate power supply. In the even of a Hard Drive failure - will start copying data to other available drives)  Note: Windows Server software currently installed on existing server is end-of-life and no longer supported. Similar issues to above and also not compatible with many newer software applications, etc. Hardware is also dated and beyond expected life expectancy. 3) Acronis Imaging Software (Backup Software)  Creates a complete “image” - exact copy - of Windows Server for quick/easy recovery in the event of a failure or disaster  Minimizes impact and downtime as there is no need to re-setup and reconfigure/re- install/reactivate all software, Users, File Shares, Shared Printers/Scanners, etc  Simply select the date of last image and restored exactly as it was in that snapshot in time. 4) New Battery Backup for Servers  Will maintain power in the event of a power outage and allow servers to safely shut down.  Typically runtime is approx 30 mins - so will not keep them running during longer outages, but will allow them to safely be shutdown and avoid potential data loss/corruption 5) Email migration to a Hosted Online Exchange platform  Uses similar technology to existing Exchange Server, but updated to provide better features and support for mobile devices. (Exchange is the gold standard in business world for features, security, mobility, reliability and support)  Hosted online so email, calendars an contacts can easily be accessed anywhere, regardless of your server being up or down.  Offloads a LOT of the server overhead and workload. Result is that the server will run much smoother and faster.  Gives you/us flexibility in management of your email addresses, account access, calendars, contacts, etc from anywhere.  Supports all current PCs and mobile devices; Smart Phones, Tablets, Desktops, Laptops, etc  Allows for easy sharing of calendars, appointments, contacts, files online, etc So the end result will be a vastly improved experience across nearly every aspect of your daily computing experience. The Servers will much more capable, faster, and secure than your existing solution. Backups will be better equipped to handle disaster recovery or data loss. The hardware is much more redundant (good thing) and stable - which ultimately leads to less downtime. More space and resources. Note: This does not include the desktops that you are using. However, accessing files and applications on the Server will be much faster and frustrations with running out of space on shared drives will not be an issue any longer. But if your personal PCs were slow before replacing the server, they still will be, unless also updated/upgraded. We would be happy to assist and consult with you on those machines too. We are an Authorized Dell Reseller and have access to better pricing for Dell Laptops/Desktops than you will find in nearly any storefront. They are also much less “bloated” with additional software and “bonus/trial” software. They are designed for business/professional use and a much different experience than what you would order online through a retailer or Best Buy, etc. Most of those stores have an option to remove all of the garbage, but often don’t because they are paid kickbacks to leave it on there - and on top of that they charge you to clean it up if requested. The Dells we order come direct from the factory and avoid all of the other junk software that gets installed. Phone: ​(763) 972-6392​ | Fax: ​(763) 201-7100​ | ​FiveTechnology.com Network Services Proposal ________________________________________________ Prepared For City of Spring Park Network Upgrades - Server Replacement, Online Exchange Different The Managed Data Solution from Five Technology is different because of the mesh of services and technology we employ. We do everything from gathering requirements to procurement, implementation, and ongoing management & support, in effect; we act as an extension to your company. Our three tiered approach produces a solution that provide our customers security, reliability and redundancy that they need. Scope of Solution Prices and specifications are subject to change until final agreement is signed. Hardware and Software Description Unit Price Qty Total File Server Hardware, Software and Support $4500.00 1 $4500.00 Base Level Dell Server Intel Xeon Processor 32 GB RAM Data Storage Drives: 2 - 2 TB SATA Hard Drives RAID1 Redundant Power Supply Multiport Gigabit Network Card Server 2012 R2 w/ 10 User CALs 3 Years of ProSupport Next Business Day On-site Service Acronis Imaging Software (disaster recovery) Includes 1 yr of manufacturer support $1200.00 1 $1200.00 2 - 3TB Hard Drives for Firewall / Backup Server $460.00 1 $460.00 APC 1500VA UPS $235.00 1 $235.00 Hardware/Software Total: $6,395.00 Hardware and Software (optional) Description Unit Price Qty Total Replace Firewall / Backup Server $2315.00 1 $2315.00 T130 Xeon Processor 8 GB RAM 4 - 2 TB hard drives in RAID10 3 year pro support with nbd onsite service High Availability Redundant Server Upgrade $3000.00 1 $3000.00 Solid State Drives for Operating System 4 - RAID 10 Hard Drives 64 GB RAM Redundant Hot Swap Power Supplies Hardware / Software Total: (optional upgrades) $5,315.00 Professional Services Description Unit Price Qty Total Server Labor $120.00 30 $3600.00 Bench Test Server at Five’s Office (setup RAID, OS, Updates) Reconfigure existing shelf to accommodate new server and switches (may need to purchase new shelf) Install New Server Setup Domain Roles (Active Directory, DNS, File Sharing, etc) Install Critical Software (Banyon, etc) Migrate data and setup file sharing on new server User Communication and Testing Setup and configure backup server Test Online Exchange Migration Labor (Optional & Recommended) $120.00 30 $3600.00 Domain Configuration to accommodate Online Exchange Online Exchange Account Setup Outlook Configuration Email Transfer Test Restore Online Exchange Online Exchange Features and Benefits - No upfront hardware costs, Business-class Email, Calendar, Contacts, Guaranteed 99.9% uptime, financially backed Microsoft service level agreement, 24/7 Phone Support, Integration with Active Directory and Outlook. Fully integrates with most Smartphones, Shared Contacts & Calendars, Calendars & Contacts sync with Smartphones, World Class data security, Less likely for email issues to take down the network. The absence of a Exchange Server on the city network will free up network and server resources to improve access to 3rd party software applications. Kaspersky Cloud-Based Anti-Virus Install and Labor (Optional & Recommended) TBD ​Estimated $30/user for 3 yrs Cloud-based Security Layer (OpenDNS) Install and Labor (Optional & Recommended) TBD ​Estimated $50/mo for all Users Professional Services Total (including optional/recommended items): $7,200.00 Pricing Summary Description Hardware & Software $6,395.00 Hardware & Software (optional) $5,315.00 Professional Services $7,200.00 Total: $18,910.00 Monthly Managed Services Description Unit Price Qty Total Use Existing Managed Service Agreement w/ Five Technology N/A Online Exchange to be paid directly to Microsoft (Optional) $3.50 15 $52.50 Need final count of email users but estimated at 10 Managed Services Increase: ~$52.50 /month ​By signing this estimate, all parties agree to the terms and conditions of this estimate. Please refer to Project Plan for payment schedule, including down payment, mid project payments, and final payment. Estimates are valid for 30 days. Proposed By: ________________________________ _ ________________________________ _ ________________________ _ Print Name Signature Date Accepted By: ________________________________ _ ________________________________ _ ________________________ _ Print Name Signature Date Project Team # Description Team Member 1. Project Manager / Technology Consultant Jay McQuillan 2. Lead Onsite Engineer Matt Raske 3. Onsite Engineer Ryan Dunlop 4. Remote Engineer Andy Meagher Terms and Conditions 1.A down payment of hardware, software, and 50% of the labor must be collected upon signing of this agreement. Upon completion of the final 50% is collected. Managed Service begins after installation. 2.All work outside “scope of solution” will be billed at current Five Technology T&M hourly rate. Work outside the “scope of solution” will require notification and sign-off from client before commencing. j:\admin\public relations\news release\mfd happenings newletter\2016\12-2016 mfd news release.docx Contact The Mound Fire Department Telephone 952-472-3555 Fax 952-472-3775 Email moundfire@moundfire.com Website Moundfire.com FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE January 10, 2017 MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT HAPPENINGS Mound, MN, January 10, 2017– During the month of December 2016, the Mound Fire Department responded to 20 fire related calls and 29 medical related calls, for a total of 49 callouts for the month. The total callouts for 2016 was 588, as compared to 2015 call outs of 550. In December, 19% of our fire and rescue calls were received on Christmas Day. Many of the Mound Firefighters were away from their families on Christmas responding to these calls. Chris Heitz, Mound Firefighter of the Year 2016 Since 1980, the Mound Fire Department has recognized one firefighter as the department “Firefighter of the Year”. The tradition continued in 2016, with the Mound “Firefighter of the Year” award going to Firefighter Chris Heitz. The recipient of the firefighter of the year award is determined by and based upon a nomination and evaluation process. The nomination process involves all of the current Mound firefighters. All active firefighters are eligible to win the award. The award is based upon predetermined performance criteria including:  A firefighter’s level of participation, involvement, and contribution to department  The number of responses to emergency fire & rescue calls  By attending and leading and department training sessions  The amount of time dedicated to public relations activities  Support of the department’s teamwork environment, and a positive attitude Chris Heitz has been a volunteer with the Mound Fire Department since joining the ranks in March 2013. Firefighter Heitz is relatively new as a firefighter with four years with the fire department, which makes his accomplishments even more significant. Congratulations to Firefighter Chris Heitz on his many accomplishments and this award, and for being selected as the 2016 Mound Firefighter of the Year! Page | 2 Notable Events: 12-08-2016: On Thursday, December 8, 2016 at 08:25 hours, the Mound Fire Department responded to an Auto-Aid request from the St Boni Fire Department for residential fire in the 6500 Block of South Bay Drive in Minnetrista. Upon arrival, the attached garage was substantially involved in fire. The Mound Fire Department, along with multiple mutual aid fire departments, assisted St. Boni Fire with extinguishing the fire. There were no injuries to the residents or firefighters. 12-25-2016: On Sunday December 25, 2016 at 15:49 hours and again at 23:04 hours, the Mound Fire Department was dispatched to a report of powerlines lying across the road and on fire in the 4300 block of Wilshire Blvd. The Mound Fire Department secured the area until Xcel Energy Crews arrived on scene to cut off power to the line. The downed line caused large power outages in the area. There were no injuries to any civilians or firefighters. 12-31-2016: On Saturday, December 31, 2016 at 14:25 hours the Mound Fire Department responded to a report of a possible fire in an attached garage in the 5400 block of Morningview Court in Minnetrista. Upon arrival, crews found a working fire with heavy smoke and fire in the attached garage. The fire was quickly extinguished which prevented the fire from extending into the house. There were no injuries to the residents or firefighters. Please Keep those Fire Hydrants Accessible! The Minnesota winter snow fall continues to rise which creates problems with piled snow on and around fire hydrants. The snow makes it difficult for firefighters to quickly find the buried fire hydrants. Having clearly marked and rapid access to fire hydrants is critical to the fire suppression efforts of the fire department, especially when responding to any type of structure fire. It normally takes a firefighter less than a minute to locate and connect a large fire hose to the fire hydrant. If a fire hydrant is buried under a pile of snow or hidden behind bushes or shrubs, then the time involved to hook up to a hydrant can double or even triple. The Mound Fire department requests that you please take the time to keep fire hydrants in your neighborhoods clear of snow. This will help us be much more efficient and timely in the event of a fire emergency! Help us help our customers by clearing away snow from fire hydrants. If you need help shoveling out or clearing your neighborhood fire hydrant…please contact Vicki Weber at the Mound Fire Administration Office 952-472-3555 and the fire department staff will make sure the fire hydrant is cleared. Thank you for your assistance! If you would like more information, please contact The Mound Fire Department at 952-472-3555 or email at moundfire@moundfire.com.