2/22/2016 - City Council - Work Session - Minutes h - 1
February 22, 2016
CITY OF SPRING PARK
WORK SESSION AGENDA
FEBRUARY 22, 2016 — 7:00 PM
SPRING PARK SPRING PARK CITY HALL
On Gale Minnetonka
1. PLANNING COMMISSION VACANCY UPDATE (5 minutes)
Williamson said there are two applications and they need to decide how to deal with them. He
suggests to meet one hour early of the March 7th meeting. He thinks both candidates should
be interviewed. He suggests 6:30 p.m. Pavot asks about the certainty of the upcoming
vacancy and Tolsma said yes. The departing commissioner has even offered to step down
now if that helps with a new appointment. Hughes thinks he would like to meet both
candidates. Beck said she would recommend appointing both candidates if they are qualified
and then asking Sarah Struck, the resigning commissioner, to choose a resignation date.
Hughes likes the idea of asking both candidates when they would like to start and give them
the option. Williamson just wants to have a full planning commission as soon as possible
because one never knows what may be coming up in the near future. Williamson wonders if
there will be a problem for the applicants to meet on March 7th and Tolsma said he thinks they
will both be available.
2. DRAINAGE EASEMENTS (10 minutes)
Williamson explained this is part of the West Arm Road project. He said this involves a
negotiation with two property owners because of a cross connection nudging another property
owner. He said they are looking for an indication that the council is satisfied with the terms of
the agreement. Hughes asks if there are two houses affected because he wonders about
where the easement actually is. Tolsma said there is a temporary construction easement for
equipment access but the only permanent easements are for the two indicated properties.
Williamson said the only difference now is the price originally contemplated is somewhat
higher. Tolsma said Barbara Ward (4368) is the property owner with the easement running the
length of the property. He said there have been negotiations and minor sticking points but
earlier compensation of $7500 has changed. Tolsma said Ward discussed this with an
attorney and a realtor and ultimately has now requested $15,000 in compensation. Tolsma told
Ward to put her final request in writing and sign it in order to have documentation of a final
offer. Tolsma said Ward did so and he has all three agreements, in hand, signed and ready to
go and the negotiations are finished. Bren asked if Ward was the only property owner
requesting compensation and Tolsma said yes. Tolsma said the other property owner is
Hackney (4372) and because of the minimal crossing easement, compensation was not being
offered. Tolsma said Hackney was okay with this. Tolsma said when Ward requested an
increase, it was based on the fact that her property would be unusable during construction and
she would be inconvenienced. Tolsma said there obviously are other costs involved than just
the $15,000 compensation. He said a total of$75-85,000 inlcuding compensation, restoration,
installation of the drainage and landscaping.
4349 WARREN AVENUE, SPRING PARK,MINNESOTA 55384-9711 (952)471-9051 FAX(952)471-9160
2
February 22, 2016
Williamson said he thinks Ward's compensation request was also based upon the possibility of
loss of income due to potential loss of leased dock space. Williamson said this request for
• increased compensation should not be a deal breaker and he just wants to get this done.
Williamson said this is a permanent solution as the easement is perpetual. Williamson asked if
the council is on board with this and everyone states this is the next best alternative as
negotiation with Lord Fletcher's Apartments had broken down. Tolsma said Goman checked
the drainage ditch running to the lake and reported Lord Fletcher's Apartments have dumped
all their snow into the ditch. Pavot wondered if there was a pollution issued and Tolsma said
they checked with the Watershed. The Watershed stated because it was downstream of the
treatment pond, there was not a concern on their part.
3. PUBLIC WORKS FIRE RESPONSE REPORT (45 minutes)
Williamson asked if Goman has seen the documents that are in front of the council this
evening and Tolsma said yes, they were reviewed on Friday. Williamson said since Goman
has seen the documents under discussion they will move forward. He said this is an item that
the personnel committee... Goman arrives. Williamson explained the discussion was just
starting. Williamson repeats the previous remarks to bring Goman up-to-speed. Williamson
said Tolsma has organized the reporting data.
Tolsma said they have been trying to make sure they have the most accurate report and a total
year report was received from the Long Lake Fire Chief. He said he and Goman went through
all the calls, one-by-one, and a lot of the calls were when Goman was off duty so those were
irrelevant. Tolsma said the timesheets had to be reconciled and the council now has an
accurate compilation. Tolsma said there were 52 calls responded to in 2015 during city hours.
• He said there were more day-time responses but some of those were when Goman was
already off, it was a weekend, or he was on vacation. He said of those calls, 22 were not
reported on his timesheets. Tolsma said from the report received from Long Lake Fire, the
times were available. Tolsma also calculated five minutes response time to the fire station and
five minutes to return to the city. Tolsma said Goman informed him 95% of the calls were to
the Navarre station. Tolsma said with ten minutes response time, plus the actual time on the
call was added to the 22 non reported calls it added up to16 hours found to be not recorded.
Tolsma said for 2015 it was estimated the total amount of time spent responding to fire calls
was 45 hours.
Tolsma said discussion should be what amount of time is the council comfortable with and
liability concerns. He said when talking with the city's insurance agent, Mark Lenz, he was told
liability is a concern as liability stays with the vehicle, wherever it is. Tolsma said Lenz also
said other entities can assume liability but there is a necessary agreement required. Tolsma
said the auditors have been consulted and of note, in their view, this requires additional IRS
paperwork and a taxable benefit would be assigned. Tolsma said something to keep in mind is
whether this would be different if he was responding to Mound Fire and it was determined that
it would be different. He said it's difficult to make the argument due to potential mutual aid call
out to a Spring Park fire.
Tolsma said when discussing this with Goman an important question is what is the Spring
Park's benefit other than maybe being a good neighbor. He said it's a benefit for the employee
• but as far as a benefit for Spring Park, it's a struggle to make the connection. He said for Long
4349 WARREN AVENUE, SPRING PARK, MINNESOTA 55384-9711 (952)471-9051 FAX(952)471-9160
3
February 22, 2016
Lake it's a benefit because they're getting a day responder. He said he doesn't know if this is
. a benefit for Spring Park taxpayers.
Hughes asks about the hours collected and if a call only lasts for 15 minutes and is cancelled,
is the call recorded accurately. Goman said full hours are based on an hour but if they are on
a call less than an hour, they still get credit for an hour. Tolsma reminded everyone that is a
fire department calculation. Tolsma said he went based on the time checked in, checked out
and travel time. Goman said what they've done since the inception is if it's a fifteen minute
call, he rounds it to a half hour so, he takes a half hour compensation time.
Beck asks about the employment agreement regarding calls during the SP work day stating
calls should be critical and Beck asks at whose discretion. Goman said it is his discretion
based upon the call. Williamson reads the language in the agreement. Hughes asked if he
responded to every critical call if he has something going. Goman said no, he has to evaluate
the situation. Tolsma said sometimes Goman doesn't know on the initial callout if it's critical or
not. Williamson asked about judging distance to travel. He asks if Goman goes directly to the
call. Goman said for the most part he goes to the station to get the truck. Williamson asked
about a sprinkler activation on Kelley Avenue. Williamson wondered why Goman had to
respond to that call and Goman said because they don't initially know what the circumstance
is. Williamson wonders why Goman would have to respond to something like that when he is
positioned on the south end of the call (Spring Park). Williamson asks if Goman travels the
speed limit because he traveled that route a lot and he knows it's about 15 minutes each way,
going the speed limit. He wonders if Goman is exempt. Williamson asked if Goman responds
faster and Goman said unless they are slowed to routine, he is responding above the speed
limit. Williamson wonders about the liability insurance in that regard. Goman said he's not
responding in a city vehicle. Goman said he drives the normal speed limit to the fire
department. Williamson said he's asking about responding with the city vehicle if he exceeds
the speed limit. Goman said sometimes if he's up on the north end because he's on city
business and a call comes out, he will respond directly to Long Lake Fire station in Long Lake.
Williamson asks if Goman uses the city vehicle when he is not on city time to respond to fire
calls and Goman said no, he uses his personal vehicle.
Hughes said living that same life while he was teaching, he was allowed to leave his position
depending upon the call due to low response personnel. He said as far as liability on the truck
and what if Goman is called to Orono or Mound for a street issue, he wonders what difference
that would make. Pavot said that is the difference, it's city related. Beck said because he's no
longer on the time clock if he's responding to a fire call. He's using the Spring Park truck as a
personal benefit. Hughes said when he was on the fire commission they were discussing a
district wide fire service and right now this is being discussed. He said he wonders about
when there are fewer volunteers. He said the next step is the duty officer program with a full-
time crew dedicated and paying for it. He said that will impact the budget drastically. Hughes
said Goman has to make the right decision. He also thinks there were some critical calls that
Goman probably didn't respond to due to his duties and required presence in Spring Park.
Williamson said he is concerned with Goman's ability to discern critical and noncritical calls in
a moment's notice. He said he's concerned about the accounting for the sizable amount of
• calls that weren't showing up on the timesheet. He said he was being paid by the city when in
fact he was on a fire call. He said he could understand if there were a few of these but this
4349 WARREN AVENUE, SPRING PARK, MINNESOTA 55384-9711 (952)471-9051 FAX(952)471-9160
4
February 22, 2016
happened with a high rate of regularity, over 40%. Goman said part of what is not recorded is
• his lack of a lunch or a break and that's difficult to calculate. He added this missed time has
already been made up for on a February timesheet. Pavot said there is so much
administration time being involved in figuring this out. She said for transparency, it's
necessary. Goman said no one knows when they're going to take their lunch breaks or their
office breaks. Pavot said she means because of the administration of calculating times away
from the city and the potential liability it seems like a waste of time to go through that exercise.
She feels when you're at work, you're at work. Bren said she's had an uncomfortable feeling
about this for a long time.
Bren said she doesn't understand why an employee needs a take home vehicle. She doesn't
understand why a personal vehicle can't be used. She said just because it's always been that
way, she doesn't think it needs to stay that way. She also doesn't understand being allowed
to respond to fire calls while on city time. She said a bigger concern is if the public works
superintendent (PSW) is allowed to be away from the city for Long Lake Fire (LLF), what
happens if there is a critical incident in the city? She wonders if it's time to make a choice: the
fire department or the city. Goman interrupts and says he guarantees it won't be a choice.
Bren continues she knows they get paid for the fire department and there is a retirement plan
and she says she has seen the benefits of this while she was city clerk at the City of St. Boni.
Bren said there is a cell phone, a laptop computer, all used for city business and she wonders
how does the council know? She thinks this should be reviewed. She recalls one morning
going to a police commission meeting and she noticed Goman was at Long Lake Fire, Navarre
Station, lowering the flag to half-staff. She wondered what that was about. Bren said it seems
to her that this is off balance. She wonders how a person justifies this as to how the other
employees are treated. Do the other employees get uniform benefits and other benefits to
leave to do other things and how do they feel about this. She wonders how does the city
function and how do they feel when this is so one-sided. She thinks she sees stress and
tension to this regard. She says she hasn't spoken much because she feels she gets talked
down for the most part but, when she saw this in the packet, she felt this was an opportunity
for her to speak her opinion. She said she used to come to city hall and she'd ask where
Goman was and nobody knew. She wonders who he answers to. Goman said he answers to
Tolsma and the city council. Bren asked how much authority Tolsma has if the council doesn't
give him good direction. She said there are so many things with having a city vehicle and the
fuel, the washes, the oil, the antifreeze, add up to a lot more expense when a city vehicle is
allowed to be taken outside of the city. She said Tolsma doesn't have a city vehicle. She said
these things she has questioned. Other employees don't get the same benefits and Goman
responded because they don't have the same job.
Pavot said a vehicle to and from home doesn't seem necessary. Obviously while in the city a
truck is necessary. Bren wonders if it's necessary when there is a road project that the PWS
watches the project. She said an engineer is paid to watch over the project. She said these
are questions and observations she has had for the three years she has been on the council
and she feels she should have probably brought this up sooner. Bren said she has a lot of
things. Goman said now is the time. Therefore, Bren asks about shoveling the sidewalks on a
holiday. When she walks she wonders who is doing this. She wonders if it's necessary for
• Goman to charge overtime to shovel a walk when it's a holiday. Bren asks about the decision
on the retaining wall on Mapleton Avenue in front of Williamson's house. She said this is
4349 WARREN AVENUE, SPRING PARK, MINNESOTA 55384-9711 (952)471-9051 FAX(952)471-9160
5
February 22, 2016
bringing up a lot of things but it's things she has questioned for a long time. She said she
• doesn't ever remember having a discussion about this project and all of a sudden one day it
was being done. Bren said she feels stupid. Goman said don't feel stupid because no one
sitting at the table knows every answer right away. Bren said she was surprised when the
invoice for Goman's work boots came up and Goman said he would show her the OSHA
standard requiring this. Pavot said the city isn't required to buy city boots and Goman
disagrees per the OSHA standard. Bren said she sees when she is walking extension cords
from Christmas lights. She wonders if they shouldn't be gathered and put away. She wonders
if Goman doesn't have time for this. She questions why Christmas lights are left all year long
on trees. She understands it costs more money to hire someone to take the lights down. She
said if there is going to be a city truck and all these extra benefits, it should be part of his pay
package. Bren said she is not in favor as to how this sits right now. Williamson said it's an
interesting and thoughtful list.
Williamson asks for Goman's response to this. Goman said he'd like a copy of the questions
so he can answer them more thoroughly but, as part of his position as public works and being
on-call, he only gets four days off per month as part of the on-call requirement. He said as part
of the cell phone it's monitoring the lift stations, taking after hours calls from contractors and
vendors. He said the take home vehicle is part of the requirements for being on-call and
responding to emergency situations and the like. He said the uniforms and safety apparel is
part of OSHA requirements. He said regarding Christmas lights they'd have to hire this out
because of lack of a bucket truck. He said the extension cords usually are frozen in the
ground so they have to wait for spring. He said the Christmas lights staying up year-round is
to save money. He said if they have them taken down the budget will increase. He said it
• doesn't hurt the trees nor does it hurt the lights to leave them up. Bren said that brings up
another question and that is because Spring Park is so small and everything is contracted out,
she wonders why the city doesn't just consider a merger with another city, such as Orono.
Goman said it's a considerable option.
Williamson said he doesn't want to explore that at this time. He said it's been discussed in
other cities and it usually dies. He said it many times comes down to a financial advantage for
one city over another and therefore because a unanimous vote is required, it doesn't happen.
He said it's essentially what the city does now with joint powers agreements and contracting
with other cities for police and fire. He said there are unique characteristics and desires for
each city and he thinks it's unlikely.
Goman said another question was the projects such as West Arm Rd. He said it's part of his
job responsibilities to inspect the water and sewer installations. He said they could contract
with the engineer to do more of this but he said this adds costs to the project. Williamson
asked about an example. Goman said he handles the water meter to the pipe, the pressure
testing. Williamson asked if he performs the testing and Goman said no, he witnesses it. He
said there are things that have to be performed, opening the fire hydrants, opening and closing
the services. What Williamson said he's getting at is they did pay an extra amount for a
manager to oversee the conduct of the contractors. He said the question posed to him by
several people is why did Goman have to spend so much time watching the project instead of
checking in from time-to-time. Goman said a project manager who is now Mike Kuno and was
• Paul Pearson who is not necessarily always at the site. He said they're paying for Tom
Christianson, an inspector and Goman to oversee the physical portion of the project; the lift
4349 WARREN AVENUE, SPRING PARK, MINNESOTA 55384-9711 (952)471-9051 FAX(952)471-9160
6
February 22, 2016
stations, the water tower painting. He said there are certain things an engineer or an inspector
• can do but not necessarily turn the valves. He said he's needed in order to witness and to
perform certain functions.
Williamson said he thinks all of this needs to be explored further and in conjunction with the
current staffing analysis being conducted, now might be the time to address this. He said right
now there is the issue with the fire calls and the accounting and the administration of it. He
said what disturbed him were the missing times and elements. Williamson said reconstruction
of immediate, unrecorded detail is difficult to recall. He said it isn't necessarily intentional. He
said he's concerned about recreating the detail this involves. He said it takes a lot of staff
time. He said the administrative overhead becomes prohibitively expensive. Goman asks if it
would be different if he was responding to Mound Fire Department as a City of Spring Park
employee. Williamson said it's a good question and his own observation is maybe or maybe
not. He said when he lived in the City of Bloomington, city staff did respond to city fire calls but
they had a large staff to draw on. He thinks the city has gotten away from that. He noted last
year the fire chief from St. Boni was not allowed to leave his job to respond to a fire call.
Goman said it depends upon the type of call. Williamson said this was stated in a public
meeting that he was unable to respond. Bren said times have changed and Goman agrees.
He said volunteerism has changed. Employers, public and private are unwilling to let
employees leave.
Williamson said the increased focus on prevention has been successful so the responses are
more related to medical responses. He said the whole point is the problem is with one
employee, the accounting of the time and the level of errors occurring and he wonders if this is
• a sustainable model. He has a sense the time is in order for some change. Goman said if
there is a change or modification down the road and, for whatever reason Long Lake Fire
covers the City of Spring Park either directly or district wide, he wonders what the decision
would be then. He understands he is only one person in his position at the city. Hughes said
depending upon the nature of the fire call, multiple agencies can be called in if it goes beyond
the all-call response. He said depending upon the rotation of mutual aid, Long Lake would be
summoned. Hughes suggests more documentation regarding what type of call, what Goman
was doing at the time allowing him to leave the city or why he couldn't leave. He said it might
help answer questions.
Williamson said he thinks they should look at something that reduces record keeping. He said
by eliminating responding to fire calls in its entirety, it would solve all those other
recordkeeping problems. Goman said the other thing to keep in mind is if eliminating all fire
calls, if there is a fire in Spring Park, he will be on the scene performing his city functions. He
said he will be still tied up on that call. Williamson said yes, but that would eliminate the
recordkeeping problems. Goman said there is concern that he is responding to fire calls so
just that it's noted, if there is a fire in Spring Park, there are still duties he will perform related to
the fire call. Pavot said the difference is Goman is responding as a PWS, not as a fire
responder. Williamson said this would also address the liability issue taking the city vehicle out
of the city to respond to a fire call.
Hughes said if the city vehicle were to be left in the city, it would be necessary to garage the
vehicle versus Goman being able to watch over the vehicle while it's at his residence. Bren
said it could be parked underneath and Goman said no, based upon what was previously
4349 WARREN AVENUE, SPRING PARK, MINNESOTA 55384-9711 (952)471-9051 FAX(952)471-9160
7
February 22, 2016
decided itcouldn't be parked below. Pavot asks what is in the truck that doesn't allow it to be
parked by the water plant or the water tower Hughes said the equipment, the hand tools, the
radio, the computer.
Pavot said she's surprised parking the truck at Goman's residence in Long Lake is deemed
safer than parked at city hall. Goman said historically it's always been a take home vehicle as
part of the on-call package. Goman said he would be more than happy to leave the vehicle at
city hall if there were more employees that could handle the on-call. He said he would be
more than happy to leave the cell phone on his desk at 4:30 but it's part of the on-call
requirements. He said the cell phone isn't a benefit. It sits right outside his shower.
Horton asks how much on-call he actually has and Goman said he only gets four days off per
month. He said every week and every-other-weekend, he's on-call. Williamson said he's
compensated three hours each day he's on-call and then if there is an actual call out there is
additional compensation. Williamson said the argument is the half weekends Goman is on call
and instead a 100% arrangement could be made but it is beyond the scope of this discussion.
Goman said he can guarantee they won't get it for $50 per day like it is now. Pavot asks if it is
a requirement of the PWS position to be on-call and Goman responds that it is. Williamson
said back in time, there weren't the new lift stations, the backup power supplies and there was
one generator that had to be rotated around the lift stations to keep the flow moving and it was
quite an orchestration. He said if there was a problem where a generator was needed, one
was ready to go. He said at that time a take home vehicle made sense to be able to mobilize
quickly. Williamson said because of the lift stations having backup generators, it's not as
critical now. Goman said he would beg to differ. Williamson said that is for another
discussion. Goman said there are other things, frozen pipes, water breaks inside a house, the
water tower. Williamson said the issue is to respond with a personal vehicle and get the city
truck and with a city the size of Spring Park, they're talking a difference of minutes. He said
what needs to be discussed is whether that is critical or not. Goman said it could be if
someone's house is flooding.
Williamson said the fire call issue is what is before the council this evening and what is
changed today can be changed again tomorrow. He thinks the other issues should be looked
at in an organized and systematic fashion at a later date. Goman said based upon the two
issues, the fire calls and the city truck usage, the city truck usage is a greater priority for the
city to be with the PWS, whether it's himself of someone else. Goman said it makes more
sense for the PW person to have the vehicle versus parking it in the garage and because of
two current staff members' concern over vapors and fumes from the vehicle it is not allowed.
Goman said it's better parked at his residence. Pavot wonders what type of security measures
he has at his residence. Goman replied there are neighborhood cameras, security lighting,
adequate police patrol coverage in his neighborhood. Williamson asked about exterior
cameras for city hall and Goman said there is nothing for the exterior. Tolsma said they've
focused on city hall for the first phase of security. He said the second phase will include the
water plant. Williamson said he thought there would be the ability to scale up in the future and
Tolsma agreed.
Hughes said he remembers a while back there were some official claims made about the
• fumes being unhealthy at city hall. Beck said it was in violation of OSHA. Pavot said she was
trying to compare the difference between outdoor storage: outdoor at city hall versus outdoor
4349 WARREN AVENUE, SPRING PARK, MINNESOTA 55384-9711 (952)471-9051 FAX(952)471-9160
8
February 22, 2016
at Goman's residence. Goman said outdoor at city hall has to do with security issues. Hughes
• said he would be very uncomfortable with the vehicle being stored outside at city hall. Hughes
believes the truck should stay with whomever is on call. Pavot said she has difficulty wrapping
her head around this just because the city is so small. Goman said he'll use an example.
Sewer backup on Lafayette Lane. He was able to go directly to the scene to investigate
instead of stopping to get the truck and go to where it is. Whether it's inside or outside, there
is delayed response. He said watermain breaks with water running down the street, icing up,
to minimize the damage and liability. He said there could be negative response from the
residents because they're used to being provided real good service. Horton asked about other
cities with take home vehicles. Goman responded Wayzata, Minnetonka, Mound, Maple Plain,
Tonka Bay, Chanhassen, Excelsior, etc. He said it isn't current data but it's not a rarity. Pavot
said she sees where it makes sense in certain situations but Spring Park is very small. Goman
said he'd be more than happy to turn over his keys and pager to Tolsma at 4:30 p.m. Pavot
reminded Goman it is part of his job description. She said he either wants the job or not. She
compares it to a doctor, either an emergency room doctor or a 9-5 oncologist. It's part of the
requirements of the job. Goman agreed and said as part of being on call, he needs — Pavot
agreed, he needs a phone but she doesn't agree he needs a take home vehicle. Bren said
she's sorry she brought all these things up as it has surpassed the allotted time.
Williamson said it would be interesting for the council to express their consensus on the fire
call responses — either status quo or initiate change. Bren asked if a decision will be made
tonight and Williamson said no, only a consensus because the meeting was not posted. Bren
asked if this was for an opinion then and, if so, she thinks there should be no response to fire
• calls during work day hours. Pavot said she's also a no. Horton said she's a no due to IRS
paperwork and liability and lack of a person in the city to respond to city issues. Hughes has a
concern about the truck liability but he thinks it can be worked out. He also thinks the long-
term direction of fire calls going to a district wide approach may help. He said from his
perspective, if Goman were to pull together an more accurate log regarding fire calls and what
he was pulled away from, if he didn't respond, why and how Goman makes the discretionary
decision. Tolsma said this can be seasonal based. He said during the winter, he is more
available. During the summer, a decision log based upon what Goman is being pulled away
from would be helpful. Goman said he currently forwards a copy of the call and sends it to
office employees as he's responding and once he's back within the city.
Williamson said at this time, based upon documentation, he believes in moving in the direction
of eliminating the fire call response. He said things can change depending upon how future
fire calls are structured. He said for now, eliminating response to fire calls during work hours
eliminates the paperwork, accounting and second guessing that goes on. He said the
proposition at the next council meeting will be to modify the agreement regarding fire calls. He
said at this time on call hours need to be discussed, including other issues raised tonight need
to be further discussed. Hughes asked if it comes out that LLF is called to a fire in Spring
Park, does that automatically bring DJ to the city as a city employee. Pavot said as an
employee of the city. Williamson said if Mound Fire asks for extra support and LLF is going to
respond, during work hours, Goman is not allowed to respond. Tolsma said there were 414
calls and he responded to 238 calls and only 52 while on city time.
•4. STAFF EXPENDITURES POLICY DISCUSSION (35 minutes)
4349 WARREN AVENUE,SPRING PARK, MINNESOTA 55384-9711 (952)471-9051 FAX(952)471-9160
9
February 22, 2016
Williamson said there is nothing written but what they're trying to get at is if city staff runs out of
• supplies, they order supplies. He said if chemicals are needed, they are ordered. He said
there have been some issues however, things above and beyond routine activities, noticed on
claims for payment. He said the dollar amount can get up there. He said they're not
concerned about a few hundred dollars. He said this can relate to a purchase of equipment or
landscaping items and it goes into thousands of dollars. He believes the council should be
consulted. He said other cities have the same issues and it's hard to write policy for all cases
for all times. He said for example check valves recently came up for Lift Station Six. He said a
judgment call needs to be made but furthering this was the question whether to order more
than what was required due to replacement concerns and that is something the council should
be consulted on. He said there have been landscaping issues regarding irrigation and berming
and past philosophy has been it's easier to ask forgiveness versus permission. He said the
issue is to whether to establish policy on what to bring to the council and he thinks a written
policy should be had. He said the language is what is difficult. Williamson said Mound went
through this a while back but they have a city manager format who is given more decision-
making power.
Horton asks if it would help to just put a dollar amount on it; depending upon the actual dollar
amount whether it would come before the council or not. Williamson said he's not sure how to
distinguish what is expected and routine and what is expected to be done. He said above and
beyond routine operation and maintenance is what is in question. Goman said this affects
95% of what he does. Hughes said within the budget for this year, if Goman hypothetically has
a request to buy all new playground equipment as an example and budgeted is 30K and if
Goman wants to spend 40K he comes to the council. If he spends $28K, that's already been
0 approved. Pavot said she thinks she remembers a discussion being held about construction
materials versus cost and she thinks this is part of that. Williamson said what Hughes is getting
at is if it's already in the budget, is it okay to just go ahead and spend it and he said the answer
is no. The budget is a plan. He said there are routine expectations but when it comes to park
equipment or water valves, there should be further discussion held.
Goman said staff has been hired to make decisions so therefore a policy needs to be
developed. He said trust has been put in the hands of staff. Goman said recommendations
were made from the PC to the council for picnic tables and benches but not for the
expenditures and it's what's needed and get it done. Williamson reminded that only the council
can make the decisions. Goman said there wasn't a dollar amount though. Williamson said it
was in the budget but it also needed the role of the council to decide what to be done.
Williamson said if there is something new or different such as expanding the scope, it needs to
come to the council. He said they need to know about the change and discuss whether the
timing is right or not.
Goman said one of his questions is if it's a dollar figure or is it what the expenditure is.
Williamson said sometimes either or. Beck said obviously a concern has been raised and she
wonders about tasking a committee to look at what other cities do to craft some ideas. Goman
lists some other cities who have dollar figures attached to administrative approval or not.
Hennepin County - $2,500; Chanhassen - $7,000; Orono - $5,000; Excelsior— operating
• budget by category, Minnetonka -$100,000. Williamson thinks Beck's suggestion is good and
Admin can get some other policies from other cities to compare. He is looking right now for
4349 WARREN AVENUE, SPRING PARK,MINNESOTA 55384-9711 (952)471-9051 FAX(952)471-9160
10
February 22, 2016
anything going above the $3,000 level that is discretionary be brought to the council. He is
• looking for clarity of the request.
5. FIRE ALARM CODE (10 minutes)
Williamson said there are materials in front of the council. Pavot put together what is front of
the council. She said she went on a tour of Pres Homes and learned a lot about protocol. She
said the present code is really great but it doesn't apply to older buildings. Hughes said there
is language in the code about exceeding certain criteria, then properties need to be brought up
to current code. Pavot said she thinks what's important is education. Williamson said in the
future, contingencies for redevelopment could be pressed for code compliance no matter if it
doesn't meet the threshold for State compliance. Pavot said she is talking about signage. She
said there is some progress on signage and the Mound Fire Chief is looking into this. Tolsma
said the City could ask multi-family units what they are doing now and maybe provide the
signage for posting. Placement of signage is discussed. Williamson wonders how many it
would take to sign multi-housing units and said an inventory should be taken. Pavot said
perhaps a grant could be gained.
Bren asked if it was up to the city to do this. Tolsma said an ordinance could be passed. Beck
said if this conversation is held at a safety meetings of multi-family structures and residents
learn the fire alarm is not tied to the fire department, she said the residents may put pressure
upon the owners to take action. Hughes wonders about putting it in the newsletter.
Williamson said there is also such a thing as a direct mail to every resident. Pavot likes the
idea of providing the signs and putting pressure upon the property owners. Williamson would
like to get a price quote for the signage and have the signs available. Bren wonders if the fire
marshal can deliver the signs and verify if they are displayed. Bren wondered how many
buildings this would apply to and it would be Lord Fletcher's, Park Island, Bayview, Edgewater.
Tolsma thinks it's better for uniformed personnel to deliver the signs versus himself. Language
on the signage is discussed. Williamson said they're going to check on number of signs
needed, pricing and language on the signs. He said the next challenge will be the installation
element. Pavot will take an inventory of her building and Horton said she will be able to get the
inventory of Park Island Apartments.
6. MISCELLANEOUS
Williamson said from Orono Police Chris Fischer there is information about the Heart Safe
program and CPR training. Williamson asked him about the presentation and what was
received was a description and elements of the program and a timeline in setting this up. He
said the real issue is to sit down with Fischer in order to make decisions about a program such
as mapping where AED's are not and prioritizing new placement of AED's and identifying
groups that would desire training. Hughes wonders if the twenty minute presentation could be
filmed so everyone sees it. Williamson said he's more interested in getting an order and
sequence. He wonders about where AED's would be necessary such as Minnetonka Drive-In,
Lord Fletcher's restaurant.
Williamson said he met with three other mayors regarding WeCan and he'll report at the next
council meeting.
107. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
4349 WARREN AVENUE, SPRING PARK, MINNESOTA 55384-9711 (952)471-9051 FAX(952)471-9160
11
February 22, 2016
a. December Financial Report
b. Fire Department Press Release
h M
Wendy Lewin, City Clerk
Dan Tolsma, City Administrator
4349 WARREN AVENUE, SPRING PARK, MINNESOTA 55384-9711 (952)471-9051 FAX (952)471-9160