Loading...
Correspondence - 3990 Sunset Drive - 3/12/2025March 7, 2024 Twin Cities Criterium Engineers 200 Southdale Ctr Edina, MN> 55435 Reinspection: December 19, 2024 Enclosed is a copy of the work completed as per your inspection report. Main floor structure: Installed joist hanger where joist intersect with the floor beams/rim And used manufacturers recommended fasteners. COMPLETED. Call if you have any questions. Don Driggs Canoe Island 1940 LLC> 952 270-6700 Scott Walsh Don Driggs Canoeisland1940 LLC PO Box 405 Spring park. MN 55384 TWIN CITIES ZICRITERIUM _ ENGINEERS December 19, 2024 Don Driggs Submitted by email: canoeislandl940@gmail.com Re: Reinspection Project Location: 3990 Sunset Drive, Spring Park, MN 55384 Criterium File No.: 24-0197 Dear Mr. Driggs: At your request, a visual reinspection of the above property has been completed. The report that follows has been prepared based on that inspection. This inspection was conducted by Steven C. Eberly, P.E. My work includes the following: 1. Visual observations during a physical walk-through on December 16, 2024. 2. Observe factors influencing the performance of the structure. 3. Provide a written report containing the following: a. Scope of services. b. Observations, site characteristics, and data deemed pertinent by me. c. Discussion of major structural factors influencing the performance of this house. d. Conclusions and any recommendations for further investigation and remedial or preventative measures. 4. This reinspection is limited to the repairs to the fire damaged framing and the nearby or related structural elements as determined by the engineer. SUMMARY In my professional opinion, the structural condition of the repaired fire damaged areas is considered to be fair, additional structural repairs are required. In addition, during our reinspection significant additional renovations, over and above the fire damaged areas included in our original structure evaluation of fire damaged areas, were noted as having taken place since our initial evaluation. The structural elements of these renovations in these areas do not appear to match the building code and no design work for these (or any areas) was provided by Criterium Twin Cities Engineers. REMAINING STRUCTURAL ISSUES/COMMENTS: Main floor structure: install joist hangers where joists intersect with floor beams/rim and use manufacturers recommended fasteners. Independently Owned and Operated Life Time Work, 200 Southdale Or. / Edina, MN 55435 O: 651.779.7700 / criteriummn.com 3990 Sunset Drive, Spring Park, MN December 19, 2024 Page 12 INSPECTION DETAILS • Our client, to whom this report is addressed, is the building owner. • The client was present during our site visit. • The following areas were inaccessible or not viewed, and this limited the extent of our structural inspection: o Most of the foundation system (underground and/or concealed due to finished conditions) o Wall and floor framing (concealed) DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE • This building is a two -level multi -family home. • The house has a crawlspace. • The structure was constructed in 1910. • The building is approximately 2800 square feet. • The front of the house faces west. DOCUMENT REVIEW In conjunction with this investigation, the following documents were provided for review: • Structural Evaluation Report — Criterium Engineers - 24-0197rep052824 These documents were considered when rendering our professional opinion regarding the performance of the home's structural system and/or when providing design specifications or repair details. FOUNDATIONIFOOTINGS Previous instructions: the perimeter of the structure requires continuous masonry foundation walls supported by frost depth (top of footing 42inches below grade) strip footings. Interior support walls require steel reinforced concrete masonry strip footings and interior support posts require steel reinforced concrete masonry support posts footings. Interior support walls and support posts do not need to be frost depth. Criterium Twin Cities Engineers is available to determine necessary design details. Reinspection findings: new or improved/re paired support post footings have been installed under floor e- beam/rim and support posts included in the fire damaged scope of work. FRAMING Previous instructions: the fire damage affected the original main structure that is two stories and ballon framed. Reconstruction activities must use platform framing. Reinspection findings: reconstruction of fire damaged areas used platform framing Previous instructions: all support or bearing walls must be supported by proper footings that are frost depth if they are located on the exterior perimeter. Reinspection findings: none of the fire damaged areas were located at the exterior perimeter. Independently Owned and Operated Life Time Work, 200 Southdale Ctr. / Edina, MN 55435 O: 651.779.7700 / criteriummn.com 3990 Sunset Drive, Spring Park, MN December 19, 2024 Page 13 Previous instructions: all floor structures must use rim joists/beams at the ends which rest upon support walls or support posts below. Joist spacing: match existing or follow local tables. Use joist hangers with manufacturer's recommended fasteners. Reinspection findings: floor structures noted as constructed per above, with the exception of incorrect List hangers used. Install correct full moist hangers. See Structural Issues above Previous instructions: all walls must have a single bottom and double top plates, match existing wall stud depth and spacing. All window and door openings must use proper headers. Larger openings in load bearing walls need appropriate beams and solid blocking in the floor structure. Reinspection findings: walls and window openings in the fire damaged areas were rebuilt per above Crawlspace Previous instructions: the wood support walls, beams, and wood posts in the crawlspace are in fair to poor condition given age and construction type. Repair all damaged and/or deteriorated support walls, beams, and wood posts to properly support the bearing walls above. Reinspection findin s: completed in the fire dama ed areas. First Floor Previous instructions: the first -floor joists and subfloor under approximately 12 feet x 18 feet (216 square feet) near the center of the original structure were structurally damaged from the fire and must be replaced. This includes approximately 6 joists. Reinspection findings: complete. Previous instructions: the previous exterior and now interior wall framing and sheathing of the load bearing wall on the west side of original building (adjacent to the furnace room) were structurally damaged by the fire and must be replaced. This wall area is approximately 16 feet long x 8 feet tall (132 square feet). Reinspection findings: completed, wall replaced with what appears to be an adequate beam and post system. Note: no design calculations provided by Criterium Twin Cities Engineers. Previous instructions: the roof framing and sheathing of the porch at the northwest corner of the building was structurally damaged by the fire and must be replaced. This area is approximately 4 feet x 9 feet (36 square feet). This includes 3 rafters. Reinspection findings this previously fire damaged roof area which included 3 rafters was removed and replaced by the floor structure for the expanded upPe_r level. Note no design was provided by Criterium Twin Cities Engineers. Second Floor Previous instructions: the second -floor joists and subfloor under the approximately 12 feet x 18 feet (216 square feet) north center bedroom/hall and the approximately 14 feet x 14 feet (196 square feet) near the center of the original structure where the two rooms abut were structurally damaged from the fire and must be replaced. This includes 6 rafters (joists). Reinspection findings: completed — 6 foists replaced Independently Owned and Operated Life Time Work, 200 Southdale Ctr. / Edina, MN 55435 O: 65 1.779.7700 / criteriummn.com 3990 Sunset Drive, Spring Park, MN December 19, 2024 Page 14 Previous instructions: the exterior wall framing and sheathing on the west side of the north center bedroom is structurally damaged by the fire and must be repaired or replaced. This area is approximately 10 feet long by 8 feet high (80 square feet). Reinspection findings: the previous wall in this area was removed as the upper level was expanded. Note: no design was provided by Criterium Twin Cities Engineers Additionai renovations: Reinsiection findings: significant additional renovations, over and above the fire damaged areas included in our original structure evaluation of fire dams ed areas were noted during our reins ection as havinq taken place since our initial evaluation. Asa professional courtesy we mention some of these areas which include a beam and post system over two exterior sliding doors —13 feet) on the west elevation, a beam and post system over a new interior opening,(-17 feet) at the southwest corner of the -building: upper level expansion at the northwest corner of the building including a new roofline. The structural elements of the renovations in these areas do not appear to match the building code and no design work for these for any areas) was provided IV Criterium Twin Cities Engineers. DESCRIPTION OF TERMS Terms used in this report to describe the condition of observable components and systems are listed and defined below. It should be noted that a term applied to an overall system does not preclude that a part or a section of the system or component may be in different condition: Excellent- Component or system is in "as new" condition, requiring no rehabilitation, and should perform in full accordance with expected performance. Good- Component or system is sound and performing its function. Although it may show signs of normal wear and tear, some minor rehabilitation work may be required. Fair- Component or system falls into one or more of the following categories: a) Evidence of previous repairs not in compliance with commonly accepted standards, b) Workmanship not in compliance with commonly accepted standards, c) Component or system is obsolete, d) Component or system approaching end of expected performance. Repair or replacement is required to prevent further deterioration or to prolong the expected life. Poor- Component or system has either failed or cannot be relied upon to continue performing its original function as a result of having exceeded its expected performance, excessively deferred maintenance, or state of disrepair. Present condition could contribute or cause the deterioration of other adjoining elements or systems. Repair or replacement is required. SCOPE OF SERVICES and !_IMITATIONS The purpose of this inspection and report is to evaluate the current condition of the structural system of this building and to determine what, if any, significant maintenance, repairs, and/or replacement to this system might be expected within the next few years. The report is not to be considered a guarantee of condition and no warranty is implied. Our evaluation of this structure is based on many indirect observations. Examination of the foundation is completed without excavation; therefore, we cannot be certain of the condition below grade. Additionally, Independently Owned and Operated Life Time Work, 200 Southdale Ctr. / Edina, MN 55435 O: 651.779.7700 / criteriummn.com 3990 Sunset Drive, Spring Park, MN December 19, 2024 Page 15 we cannot certify that the footings extend below the frost line. We cannot see most of the framing. We look for cracks, bulges, and other evidence of distress or deterioration to help us evaluate the condition. In addition, often, construction details cannot be known, and we then assess that system with typical construction practices for our area in mind. As with any limited inspection, it is possible that there are structural deficiencies that cannot be known. The scope of this inspection does not include a comprehensive evaluation for code compliance, governmental regulation compliance, fire safety, or hazardous materials in or around this building. It does not include an inspection of heating, cooling, plumbing and electrical systems or repair designs. Inspecting for mold is not included in the scope of a structural inspection. Our services do not include determining the presence of a virus in this building. Evidence of any moisture -related problems in the home is not always visible. We cannot be responsible for any such conditions that might be discovered later. This report is not a termite inspection, and no responsibility is assumed for any damage caused by wood -destroying organisms. This report is based on an examination of the structural system and is an opinion about the condition of the structural system of the building. It is based on evidence available during a diligent inspection of all reasonably accessible areas. No surface materials were removed, no destructive testing undertaken, nor furnishings moved. This report is not an exhaustive technical evaluation. Examination of the exterior veneer, exterior siding, interior walls, trim, windows, doors or frames is completed only to see if any signs of differential movement are present and not to render an opinion of the condition of these items. Issues concerning the veneer, siding, trim, windows, doors or frames, or any associated rot, caulking, etc., are not included in the scope of a structural inspection and, if we address any of these items in our report, it is only as a courtesy and should not be considered an opinion of these items or an all-inclusive list of deficiencies. As Professional Engineers, it is our responsibility to evaluate available evidence relevant to the purpose of this inspection. We are not, however, responsible for conditions that could not be seen or were not within the scope of our service at the time of the inspection. If additional documentation or information is made available for review, I reserve the right to amend or add to the opinions and observations presented in this report. No building is perfect. As you review this report, pay particular attention to our notes that often our observations and recommendations are typical of many structures we inspect. CLOSING In summary, I consider the structural condition of to repaired fire damaged areas to be fair, additional structural repairs are required. In addition renovations do not appear to meet the building code. Opinions and recommendations in this report are limited to the scope of work. This report has been prepared in strict confidence with you as our client. Reliance upon our report by other parties is strictly prohibited. If you choose to share our report, you agree to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the Engineer from any third -party action. No reproduction or re -use is permitted without express written consent. Further, we will not release this report to anyone without your permission. If additional documentation or information is made available for review, I reserve the right to amend or add to the opinions and observations presented in this report. Please call with any additional questions you may have. Thank you for the opportunity to be of assistance to you. Independently Owned and Operated Life Time Work, 200 Southdale Ctr. / Edina, MN 55435 O: 651.779.7700 / criteriummn.com 3990 Sunset Drive, Spring Park, MN December 19, 2024 Page 16 Sincerely, Steven C. Eberly, P.E. MN #24703 Thereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. �w«:T Steven C. Eberly, P.E. Date: December 19, 2024 License #: 24073 (MN) This report is protected by copyright laws; all rights reserved. Reproduction and distribution of this report without written permission of the company is prohibited. © Criterium Engineers 2024. Independently Owned and Operated Life Time Work, 200 Southdale Ctr. / Edina, MN 55435 O: 651.779.7700 / criteriummn.com AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES :.:FiNGINEERS This is the complete agreement regarding engineering services to be provided by Criterium-Twin Cities Engineers (CTC) as described below a d is int ded to be a legally binding agreement. Read it carefully. CLIENT: 00 )9 EMAIL: ("'A"e-i "Q-;q�X11 j'y1LL LOCATION OF PROPERTY: DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: rn Y, PERMISSION TO COORDINATE WITH OTHERS: (Clienta conflicts of interest with the following parties): r r1 5, !t " any and a co munications and waives any and all STRUCTURAL SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED - (:T(- nnl=.q tun-r rnnini it T nF-eTD1 it-T1\fC rl„al,- 4 Structural Evaluation —sae visit to evaluate existing conditions for significant deficiencies and/or repairs needed. Evaluation of: 7! _ D"i m �-9 J✓i _ifA4 /,,1 1 - and the near6y structural elements as applicable. Structural Modification Visit - Site visit Describe: to assess feasibility of planned modification (if eenRgineering caics are required, fees apply) Site visit to gather information for structural l f"�+ lan review or previous modifications Design/repair details — written specs (architectural drawings not included) Yes No Describe: ❑ ❑ ❑ TSD fees apply) ITEMS 1-7 BELOW HAVE BEEN REVIEWED ARE UNDERSTOOD AND 1 1 ACCEPTED (Init als) 1. iVo inspection of any other systems (plumbing, electrical, mechanical, interior finishes, etc.) is included. �(j�! (p� 2. Our evaluation is non-destructive, non-invasive, and limited to those portions of the property that could be visually exam'ified 14 > without excavation, removing surface finishes, disassembling equipment, or moving furnishings and equipment. CTC DOES ` NOT CONDUCT DESTRUCTIVE INSPECTIONS. 3. Our scope of services does not Include an exhaustive technical investigation. No soils investigation, material sampling, or analytic tests, and except in the case of providing an engineered design, no precise measurements or engineering calculations are performed. 4_ We will not determine whether the property conforms to any building codes, or regulations, or restrictions that may be enforced within the jurisdiction. 5. Probable cost estimates figures, if provided, are based on statistical construction records, past project experience, and judgment. The actual cost will vary based on economic and bidding conditions. We recommend that the actual costs be determined by obtaining competitive bids. 3. In the event that Client decides to engage the services of a Contractor to make repairs or modifications to your property, it is understood that the Contractor, not CTC, is responsible for the construction of the project. CTC is not responsible for the acts or omissions of any contractor, subcontractor, or material supplier; for safety precautions, programs or enforcement; or for construction means, methods, techniques, sequences and procedures employed by the Contractor. 7. It is understood and agreed that CTC shalt not be responsible or liable for implementing the recommendations or for Client's determination to implement or not implement CTC's recommendations. FEES o ``�0 $ �j,�6ite visit (report included if applicable): Fee is to be paid at or before site visit. Design work, construction documents details, and return visits are not included in this fee. $ Add-ons (e.g.: retaining walls, outbuildings, remodels, confined spaces, etc.): $175-$350 each $ Design/Engineering — Retainer: $525 or 50% of est. total design cost, whichever is greater. $ /lDesign/Engineering - Lump Sum $ �fv5 Design/Engineering/Other — Hourly; $175/hour - including but not limited to: design/calcs; communication with client, contractor, city; bid review; revisions; etc. $ Expedited Service for Design/Engineering - $300 or 20%, whichever is greater, $ Travel Surcharge $ Return Site Visit: $475 minimum - conditions exposed, recheck same issue wrn 12 months, construction observation $175/h (site, travel, & report time). Amount Due Today (Balance of accrued -fees is due prior to delivery of our product). $ Lr t Independently Owned and Operated ffJ t, Life Time Work. 200 SoAcIale Ctr. / Edina, &V SSA35 v Oz 651J79.7700 /criterlummn.c,am E N G i N E E R S May 28, 2024 Don Driggs Submitted by email: canoeislandl940@gmail.com Re: Structural Evaluation Project Location: 3990 Sunset Drive, Spring Park, MN 55384 Criterium File No.: 24-0197 Dear Mr. Driggs: At your request, a visual structural evaluation of the above property has been completed. The report that follows has been prepared based on that inspection. This inspection was performed by Steven C. Eberly, P.E. My work includes the following: 1. Visual observations during a physical walk-through on May 15, 2024. 2. Observe factors influencing the performance of the structure. 3. Provide a written report containing the following: a. Scope of services. b. Observations, site characteristics, and data deemed pertinent by me. c. Discussion of major structural factors influencing the performance of this house. d. Conclusions and any recommendations for further investigation and remedial or preventative measures. 4. This inspection is limited to the fire damaged framing and the nearby or related structural elements as determined by the engineer. You asked me to pay special attention to determine the extent of the structural framing that must be repaired or replaced. SUMMARY in my professional opinion, the structural condition of this building is considered to be poor when compared to others of similar age and construction type. The building is repairable. Replacement of approximately 432 square feet of floor framing and subfloor plus approximately 26 linear feet (212 square feet) of wall framing and sheathing and approximately 36 square feet of roof framing which were damaged by the recent fire is required before proceeding with additional restoration work. See attached diagrams for more details on the locations of this framing replacement. INSPECTION DETAILS Our client, to whom this report is addressed, is the building owner. The client was present during our site visit. The following areas were inaccessible or not viewed, and this limited the extent of our structural inspection: o Portions of the attic area o Most of the foundation system (underground and/or concealed due to finished conditions) o Wall and floor framing (concealed) Independently Owned and Operated Life Time Work, 200 Southdale Ctr. / Edina, MN 55435 O: 651.779,7700 / criteriummn.com 3990 Sunset Drive, Spring Park, MN May 28, 2024 Page 13 The previous exterior and now interior wall framing and sheathing of the load bearing wail on the west side of original building (adjacent to the furnace room) were structurally damaged by the fire and must be replaced. This wall area is approximately 16 feet long 16 feet x 8 feet tall (132 square feet). The roof framing and sheathing of the porch at the northwest corner of the building was structurally damaged by the fire and must be replaced. This area is approximately 4 feet x 9 feet (36 square feet). This includes 3 rafters. Second Floor The second -floor joists and subfloor under the approximately 12 feet x 18 feet (216 square feet) north center bedroom/hall and the approximately 14 feet x 14 feet (196 square feet) near the center of the original structure where the two rooms abut were structurally damaged from the fire and must be replaced. This includes 6 rafters. The exterior wall framing and sheathing on the west side of the north center bedroom is structurally damaged by the fire and must be repaired or replaced. This area is approximately 10 feet long by 8 feet high (80 square feet). DESCRIPTION OF TERMS Terms used in this report to describe the condition of observable components and systems are listed and defined below. It should be noted that a term applied to an overall system does not preclude that a part or a section of the system or component may be in different condition: Excellent- Component or system is in "as new" condition, requiring no rehabilitation, and should perform in full accordance with expected performance. Good- Component or system is sound and performing its function. Although it may show signs of normal wear and tear, some minor rehabilitation work may be required. Fair- Component or system falls into one or more of the following categories: a) Evidence of previous repairs not in compliance with commonly accepted standards, b) Workmanship not in compliance with commonly accepted standards, c) Component or system is obsolete, d) Component or system approaching end of expected performance. Repair or replacement is required to prevent further deterioration or to prolong the expected life. Poor- Component or system has either failed or cannot be relied upon to continue performing its original function as a result of having exceeded its expected performance, excessively deferred maintenance, or state of disrepair. Present condition could contribute or cause the deterioration of other adjoining elements or systems. Repair or replacement is required. SCOPE OF SERVICES and LIMITATIONS The purpose of this inspection and report is to evaluate the current condition of the structural system of this building and to determine what, if any, significant maintenance, repairs, and/or replacement to this system might be expected within the next few years. The report is not to be considered a guarantee of condition and no warranty is implied. Our evaluation of this structure is based on many indirect observations. Examination of the foundation is completed without excavation; therefore, we cannot be certain of the condition below grade. Additionally, we cannot certify that the footings extend below the frost line. We cannot see most of the framing. We Independently Owned and Operated Life Time Work, 200 Southdale Or. / Edina, MN 55435 O: 651.779,7700 / criteriummn.com 3990 Sunset Drive, Spring Park, MN May 28, 2024 Page 14 look for cracks, bulges, and other evidence of distress or deterioration to help us evaluate the condition. In addition, often, construction details cannot be known, and we then assess that system with typical construction practices for our area in mind. As with any limited inspection, it is possible that there are structural deficiencies that cannot be known. The scope of this inspection does not include a comprehensive evaluation for code compliance, governmental regulation compliance, fire safety, or hazardous materials in or around this building. It does not include an inspection of heating, cooling, plumbing and electrical systems or repair designs. Inspecting for mold is not included in the scope of a structural inspection. Our services do not include determining the presence of a virus in this building. Evidence of any moisture -related problems in the home is not always visible. We cannot be responsible for any such conditions that might be discovered later. This report is not a termite inspection, and no responsibility is assumed for any damage caused by wood -destroying organisms. This report is based on an examination of the structural system and is an opinion about the condition of the structural system of the building. It is based on evidence available during a diligent inspection of all reasonably accessible areas. No surface materials were removed, no destructive testing undertaken, nor furnishings moved. This report is not an exhaustive technical evaluation_ Examination of the exterior veneer, exterior siding, interior walls, trim, windows, doors or frames is completed only to see if any signs of differential movement are present and not to render an opinion of the condition of these items. Issues concerning the veneer, siding, trim, windows, doors or frames, or any associated rot, caulking, etc., are not included in the scope of a structural inspection and, if we address any of these items in our report, it is only as a courtesy and should not be considered an opinion of these items or an all-inclusive list of deficiencies. As Professional Engineers, it is our responsibility to evaluate available evidence relevant to the purpose of this inspection. We are not, however, responsible for conditions that could not be seen or were not within the scope of our service at the time of the inspection. If additional documentation or information is made available for review, I reserve the right to amend or add to the opinions and observations presented in this report. No building is perfect. As you review this report, pay particular attention to our notes that often our observations and recommendations are typical of many structures we inspect. CLOSING In summary, I consider the structural condition of this building to be poor when compared to others of similar age and construction type. Opinions and recommendations in this report are limited to the scope of work. This report has been prepared in strict confidence with you as our client. Reliance upon our report by other parties is strictly prohibited_ If you choose to share our report, you agree to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the Engineer from any third -party action. No reproduction or re -use is permitted without express written consent. Further, we will not release this report to anyone without your permission. If additional documentation or information is made available for review, I reserve the right to amend or add to the opinions and observations presented in this report. Please call with any additional questions you may have, Thank you for the opportunity to be of assistance to you. Independently Owned and Operated Life Time Work, 200 Southdale Ctr. / Edina, MN 55435 O: 651,779.7100 / criteriummn.com 3990 Sunset Drive, Spring Park, MN May 28, 2024 Page 15 Sincerely, 'k, C, Steven C. Eberly, P.E. MN #24703 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Steven C. Eberly, P.E. i Date: May 28, 2024 License #: 24073 (MN) This report is protected by copyright laws; all rights reserved. Reproduction and distribution of this report without written permission of the company is prohibited. Q Criterium Engineers 2024. Independently Owned and Operated Life Time Work, 200 Southdale Ctr. / Edina, MN 55435 O: 651.779.7700 / criteriummn.com